You’ve probably heard that the coronavirus pandemic triggered a worldwide mental-health crisis. This narrative took hold almost as quickly as the virus itself. In the spring of 2020, article after article—even an op-ed by one of us—warned of a looming psychological epidemic.
As clinical scientists and research psychologists have pointed out, the coronavirus pandemic has created many conditions that might lead to psychological distress: sudden, widespread disruptions to people’s livelihoods and social connections; millions bereaved; and the most vulnerable subjected to long-lasting hardship. A global collapse in well-being has seemed inevitable.
We joined a mental-health task force, commissioned by The Lancet, in order to quantify the pandemic’s psychological effects. When we reviewed the best available data, we saw that some groups—including people facing financial stress—have experienced substantial, life-changing suffering. However, looking at the global population on the whole, we were surprised not to find the prolonged misery we had expected.
We combed through close to 1,000 studies that examined hundreds of thousands of people from nearly 100 countries. This research measured many variables related to mental health—including anxiety, depression, and deaths by suicide—as well as life satisfaction. We focused on two complementary types of evidence:
Surveys that examined comparable groups of people before and during the pandemic and studies tracking the same individuals over time. Neither type of study is perfect, but when the same conclusions emerged from both sets of evidence, we gained confidence that we were seeing something real.
Early in the pandemic, our team observed in these studies what the media was reporting: Average levels of anxiety and depression—as well as broader psychological distress—climbed dramatically, as did the number of people experiencing clinically significant forms of these conditions.
For example, in both the U.S. and Norway, reports of depression rose three-fold during March and April of 2020 compared with averages collected in previous years. And in a study of more than 50,000 people across the United Kingdom, 27 percent showed clinically significant levels of distress early in the pandemic, compared with 19 percent before the pandemic.
But as spring turned to summer, something remarkable happened: Average levels of depression, anxiety, and distress began to fall. Some data sets even suggested that overall psychological distress returned to near-pre-pandemic levels by early summer 2020. We share what we learned in a paper that is forthcoming in Perspective on Psychological Science.
We kept digging into the data to account for any anomalies. For example, some of the data sets came disproportionately from wealthy countries, so we expanded our geographic lens. We also considered that even if the pandemic didn’t produce intense, long-term distress, it might have undercut people’s overall life satisfaction. So, members from our team examined the largest data set available on that topic, from the Gallup World Poll.
This survey asks people to evaluate their life on a 10-point scale, with 10 being the best possible life and zero being the worst. Representative samples of people from most of the world’s countries answer this question every year, allowing us to compare results from 2020 with preceding years. Looking at the world as a whole, we saw no trace of a decline in life satisfaction: People in 2020 rated their lives at 5.75 on average, identical to the average in previous years.
We also wondered if the surveys weren’t reaching the people who were struggling the most. If you’re barely holding things together, you might not answer calls from a researcher. However, real-time data from official government sources in 21 countries showed no detectable increase in instances of suicide from April to July 2020, relative to previous years; in fact, suicide rates actually declined slightly within some countries, including the U.S. For example, California expected to see 1,429 deaths by suicide during this period, based on data from prior years; instead, 1,280 occurred.
We were surprised by how well many people weathered the pandemic’s psychological challenges. In order to make sense of these patterns, we looked back to a classic psychology finding: People are more resilient than they themselves realize. We imagine that negative life events—losing a job or a romantic partner—will be devastating for months or years. When people actually experience these losses, however, their misery tends to fade far faster than they imagined it would.
The capacity to withstand difficult events also applies to traumas such as living through war or sustaining serious injury. These incidents can produce considerable anguish, and we don’t want to minimize the pain that so many suffer. But study after study demonstrates that a majority of survivors either bounce back quickly or never show a substantial decline in mental health.
Human beings possess what some researchers call a psychological immune system, a host of cognitive abilities that enable us to make the best of even the worst situation. For example, after breaking up with a romantic partner, people may focus on the ex’s annoying habits or relish their newfound free time.
The pandemic has been a test of the global psychological immune system, which appears more robust than we would have guessed. When familiar sources of enjoyment evaporated in the spring of 2020, people got creative. They participated in drive-by birthday parties, mutual-assistance groups, virtual cocktail evenings with old friends, and nightly cheers for health-care workers.
Some people got really good at baking. Many found a way to reweave their social tapestry. Indeed, across multiple large data sets, levels of loneliness showed only a modest increase, with 13.8 percent of adults in the U.S. reporting always or often feeling lonely in April 2020, compared with 11 percent in spring 2018.
But these broad trends and averages shouldn’t erase the real struggles—immense pain, overwhelming loss, financial hardships—that so many people have faced over the past 17 months. For example, that 2.8 percent increase in the number of Americans reporting loneliness last spring represents 7 million people. Like so many aspects of the pandemic, the coronavirus’s mental-health toll was not distributed evenly.
Early on, some segments of the population—including women and parents of young children—exhibited an especially pronounced increase in overall psychological distress. As the pandemic progressed, lasting mental-health challenges disproportionately affected people who were facing financial issues, individuals who got sick with COVID-19, and those who had been struggling with physical and mental-health disorders prior to the pandemic.
The resilience of the population as a whole does not relieve leaders of their responsibility to provide tangible support and access to mental-health services to those people who have endured the most intense distress and who are at the greatest ongoing risk.
But the astonishing resilience that most people have exhibited in the face of the sudden changes brought on by the pandemic holds its own lessons. We learned that people can handle temporary changes to their lifestyle—such as working from home, giving up travel, or even going into isolation—better than some policy makers seemed to assume.
As we look ahead to the world’s next great challenges—including a future pandemic—we need to remember this hard-won lesson: Human beings are not passive victims of change but active stewards of our own well-being. This knowledge should empower us to make the disruptive changes our societies may require, even as we support the individuals and communities that have been hit hardest.
By: Lara Aknin, Jamil Zaki, and Elizabeth Dunn
Lara Aknin is a psychology professor at Simon Fraser University and the chair of the Mental Health and Wellbeing Task Force for The Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission. Jamil Zaki is a professor of psychology at Stanford University and the director of the Stanford Social Neuroscience Laboratory. He is the author of The War For Kindness: Building Empathy in a Fractured World. Elizabeth Dunn is a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia and a co-author of Happy Money: The Science of Happier Spending.
Source: COVID-19 Did Not Affect Mental Health the Way You Think – The Atlantic
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the mental health of people around the world. Similar to the past respiratory viral epidemics, such as the SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and the influenza epidemics, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in different population groups, including the healthcare workers, general public, and the patients and quarantined individuals.
The Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee of the United Nations recommends that the core principles of mental health support during an emergency are “do no harm, promote human rights and equality, use participatory approaches, build on existing resources and capacities, adopt multi-layered interventions and work with integrated support systems.”COVID-19 is affecting people’s social connectedness, their trust in people and institutions, their jobs and incomes, as well as imposing a huge toll in terms of anxiety and worry.
COVID-19 also adds to the complexity of substance use disorders (SUDs) as it disproportionately affects people with SUD due to accumulated social, economic, and health inequities. The health consequences of SUDs (for example, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, type 2 diabetes, immunosuppression and central nervous system depression, and psychiatric disorders) and the associated environmental challenges (e.g., housing instability, unemployment, and criminal justice involvement) increase risk for COVID-19.
- CDC (11 February 2020). “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- Luo Y, Chua CR, Xiong Z, Ho RC, Ho CS (23 November 2020). “A Systematic Review of the Impact of Viral Respiratory Epidemics on Mental Health: An Implication on the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic”. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 11: 565098. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565098. PMC 7719673. PMID 33329106.
- “Inter-Agency Standing Committee Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial support” (PDF). MH Innovation. Archived (PDF) from the original on 31 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- “OECD”. read.oecd-ilibrary.org. Retrieved 7 May 2020.
- Jemberie WB, Stewart Williams J, Eriksson M, Grönlund AS, Ng N, Blom Nilsson M, et al. (21 July 2020). “Substance Use Disorders and COVID-19: Multi-Faceted Problems Which Require Multi-Pronged Solutions”. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 11: 714. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00714. PMC 7396653. PMID 32848907. S2CID 220651117.
- De Man J, Buffel V, van de Velde S, Bracke P, Van Hal GF, Wouters E (January 2021). “Disentangling depression in Belgian higher education students amidst the first COVID-19 lockdown (April-May 2020)”. Archives of Public Health. 79 (1): 3. doi:10.1186/s13690-020-00522-y. PMC 7789891. PMID 33413635. Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Fuller K (9 December 2020). “COVID Lockdowns and Mental Health Breakdowns”. Psychology Today. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
- “ICN COVID-19 Update: New guidance on mental health and psychosocial support will help to alleviate effects of stress on hard-pressed staff”. ICN – International Council of Nurses. Archived from the original on 28 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- “Emergency Responders: Tips for taking care of yourself”. emergency.cdc.gov. 10 January 2020. Archived from the original on 27 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- “Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak” (PDF). World Health Organization. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)”. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 29 March 2020. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- Ghosh, R.; Dubey, M. J.; Chatterjee, S.; Dubey, S. (2020). “Impact of COVID -19 on children: special focus on the psychosocial aspect – Minerva Pediatrica 2020 June;72(3):226-35”. Minerva Pediatrica. 72 (3): 226–235. doi:10.23736/s0026-4946.20.05887-9. PMID 32613821. S2CID 220307198. Retrieved 27 March 2021.
- Guessoum SB, Lachal J, Radjack R, Carretier E, Minassian S, Benoit L, Moro MR (September 2020). “Adolescent psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown”. Psychiatry Research. 291: 113264. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113264. PMC 7323662. PMID 32622172.
- Imran N, Aamer I, Sharif MI, Bodla ZH, Naveed S (26 June 2020). “Psychological burden of quarantine in children and adolescents: A rapid systematic review and proposed solutions”. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 36 (5): 1106–1116. doi:10.12669/pjms.36.5.3088. PMC 7372688. PMID 32704298.
- Panda PK, Gupta J, Chowdhury SR, Kumar R, Meena AK, Madaan P, et al. (January 2021). “Psychological and Behavioral Impact of Lockdown and Quarantine Measures for COVID-19 Pandemic on Children, Adolescents and Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 67 (1). doi:10.1093/tropej/fmaa122. PMC 7798512. PMID 33367907.
- Sethy M, Mishra R (2020). “An Integrated Approach to Deal with Mental Health Issues of Children and Adolescent during COVID-19 Pandemic”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. doi:10.7860/jcdr/2020/45418.14002. ISSN 2249-782X.
- Shah K, Mann S, Singh R, Bangar R, Kulkarni R (August 2020). “Impact of COVID-19 on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents”. Cureus. 12 (8): e10051. doi:10.7759/cureus.10051. PMC 7520396. PMID 32999774.
- Singh S, Roy D, Sinha K, Parveen S, Sharma G, Joshi G (November 2020). “Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations”. Psychiatry Research. 293: 113429. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113429. PMC 7444649. PMID 32882598.
- Pedrosa AL, Bitencourt L, Fróes AC, Cazumbá ML, Campos RG, de Brito SB, Simões E, Silva AC (2020). “Emotional, Behavioral, and Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Frontiers in Psychology. 11: 566212. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566212. PMC 7561666. PMID 33117234.
- Fegert JM, Vitiello B, Plener PL, Clemens V (12 May 2020). “Challenges and burden of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: a narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality”. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 14 (1): 20. doi:10.1186/s13034-020-00329-3. PMC 7216870. PMID 32419840.
- Marques de Miranda D, da Silva Athanasio B, Sena Oliveira AC, Simoes-E-Silva AC (December 2020). “How is COVID-19 pandemic impacting mental health of children and adolescents?”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 51: 101845. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101845. PMC 7481176. PMID 32929399.
- “Coping with a Disaster or Traumatic Event”. 13 September 2019.
- Barr, Matthew; Copeland-Stewart, Alicia (6 May 2021). “Playing Video Games During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Effects on Players’ Well-Being”. Games and Culture: 15554120211017036. doi:10.1177/15554120211017036. ISSN 1555-4120.
- Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, et al. (April 2020). “Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak”. The Lancet. Psychiatry. 7 (4): e15–e16. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X. PMC 7129426. PMID 32085839.
- Liu S, Yang L, Zhang C, Xiang YT, Liu Z, Hu S, Zhang B (April 2020). “Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak”. The Lancet. Psychiatry. 7 (4): e17–e18. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30077-8. PMC 7129099. PMID 32085841.
- Golberstein E, Wen H, Miller BF (September 2020). “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Mental Health for Children and Adolescents”. JAMA Pediatrics. 174 (9): 819–820. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1456. PMID 32286618.
- Trump DJ (5 October 2020). “Executive Order on Saving Lives Through Increased Support For Mental- and Behavioral-Health Needs”.
- Czeisler MÉ, Lane RI, Petrosky E, Wiley JF, Christensen A, Njai R, et al. (August 2020). “Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic – United States, June 24-30, 2020”. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 69 (32): 1049–1057. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1. PMC 7440121. PMID 32790653.
- Taquet M, Luciano S, Geddes JR, Harrison PJ (February 2021). “Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA”. The Lancet. Psychiatry. 8 (2): 130–140. doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30462-4. PMC 7820108. PMID 33181098. S2CID 226846568.Rosman K (3 April 2020). “For Those With O.C.D., a Threat That Is Both Heightened and Familiar”. The New York Times. Retrieved 27 April 2020.