How Low-Code Creates Agility In a Turbulent Business Environment

The pandemic taught us that change is real. It taught us that sometimes a business has to change in order to survive. Sometimes the customers demand change. Sometimes not just revenue, but human health depends on being able to change fast enough. And if you can’t change, you are going to let your customers down. You’ll let your employees down.

These are the reflections of Matt Calkins, co-founder and CEO of Appian, a low-code automation platform that has for almost 20 years helped companies undergo digital transformations. Calkins believes that while many companies have been talking about digital transformation for a decade, the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated that talk is not enough; using technology to create agility in an organization is now a business imperative.

He admits that his industry is responsible for much of the confusion around terms like digital transformation, visual transformation, hyper automation, low-code, and digital automation. “Those terms basically mean the same thing,” he explains. “They refer to using technology to allow a business to change faster because the world is changing faster, and the business has to keep up.”

Low-code gives you the fastest possible way to build and run a new application. It allows a business to specify a new pattern of behaviour by drawing a flow chart instead of writing lines of code.

“When you make a new application, the thing that slows you down the most is you’ve got to write the code, debug it, test it, and change it,” he explains. “Low-code allows companies to create processes by dragging and dropping, by drawing a picture, a logical flow chart. And this is much more intuitive and mirrors the way humans think about processes and procedures and applications. It’s a very human way to communicate.”

Because low-code is highly flexible and allows you to build and modify unique software for a unique situation, companies using it responded quickly when the pandemic hit.

“They were able to change their processes and the way they work with their customers. They were able to coordinate their employees better and deal with the dispersion of people and assets,” Calkins says.

The pandemic made coordination at a distance across separation a vital skill. Companies had to rally their teams and resources, create new workflows, and delegate decision making to the right person. Businesses that had already embarked on a digital transformation journey were better placed to do this than those that hadn’t.

“Big businesses are very slow to move sometimes,” Calkins says. “A small business sometimes doesn’t even need a procedure. They can just delegate it to a person. But a big organization that needs to do something a hundred thousand times can’t delegate that to a person. They absolutely need a system. The bigger an organization gets, the more scale it requires. And the more scale, the more you must systematize. And so, your agility, your ability to change as a big organization is absolutely a function of software. Software has locked us into patterns because it’s a formula and hard to alter.”

So, are there any barriers for companies considering using low-code?   “In the last few years, they have become exceptionally low,” he explains. “It’s now much, much easier to start a new project in low-code than it ever has been. At this point, products are free to use on the internet. Training is probably free. Thousands of people have certifications around the world. The total cost of ownership has come down, and it’s now very affordable. For these reasons, Forrester says that 75 per cent of organizations will be using low code by the end of 2021.”

Calkins says that because low-code empowers people to communicate with computers in a very human way, it delights them.

“It empowers two [groups of] people specifically. It empowers developers because studies show they can develop 10 to 20 times as much on a low-code platform than if they weren’t using one. It also empowers users because it allows them to participate as members of a dispersed team with great cohesion. It allows them to be connected to key data at the moment of decision, which they wouldn’t otherwise have been. It’s also super empowering as a user because we’re coordinating the assets across the dispersed enterprise so that you can make the decisions at the moment you need to make them.”

How does the Appian platform operate?

“We see our industry is comprised of three core functions. The first one is to discover your processes: to learn what’s actually going on inside your business, so you can figure out what you want to build software around. The second part is to design a new process, and the third is to automate that process to execute it. You have to do the work by delegating it to people, artificial intelligence, robotic process automation, or even business rules.

“Our platform allows you to discover, design and automate your new process. And so that’s what digital transformation or, we like to say, low-code is all about. And by bringing these three things together, we’ve also made this industry far more accessible than it was recently.”

Recent research conducted by Appian, in conjunction with the Economist Intelligence Unit, reveals that 89 per cent of Australian executives believe their organisation encountered operational difficulties in addressing the challenges posed by the pandemic, and 41 per cent described them as significant.

Calkins says that the study focused on the obligations of the modern CIO and the expectations on them. It revealed that 83 per cent of respondents said that their current applications weren’t good enough. They needed them to be more agile, scalable, and flexible to deal with future challenges. But IT departments are also experiencing a serious backlog, so they need to clear the backlog and create better applications.

“The survey says there’s a lot of pressure on the CIO, but I also say there’s a spotlight, there’s an opportunity, and there is respect for the IT function like there’s never been.”

Beyond COVID-19

Calkins predicts that our world will continue to change at high speed. And businesses will have to respond by meeting the needs of all their constituencies: customers, regulators, employees, and even the new boss whose plan disrupts existing patterns. He says the next challenge businesses will face is adopting a hybrid work model.

“It’s going to be different,” he says. We’re going to have customers demanding different services from different places, through different media, and workers working from different places in different modes. We’re entering a new world.

“Businesses are always looking for an edge, and once they find one, they stick with it. They’re going to use agility as their differentiator. So, if you thought it was scary a few years ago to be a slow business, it’s going to be scarier next year because now we’ve emboldened a set of competitors who are all gaining on you because they are fast. And so, everybody’s got to raise their game.”

Clare Loewenthal

By: Clare Loewenthal

Source: How low-code creates agility in a turbulent business environment – Dynamic Business


Related Contents:

Schmarzo, Bill (31 May 2017). “What is Digital Transformation?”. Retrieved 9 July 2021.

“Digital Transformation 101: The Only Guide You’ll Ever Need”. 3 November 2019. Retrieved 9 July 2021.

“What is digital transformation? Definition, Examples, Main Areas”. Retrieved 9 July 2021.

“E-commerce to Account for Half the Growth in Global Retail by 2025”. 25 March 2021.

Aleksej Heinze; Marie Griffiths; Alex Fenton; Gordon Fletcher (2018). “Knowledge exchange partnership leads to digital transformation at Hydro-X Water Treatment, Ltd”. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. 37 (4): 6–13. doi:10.1002/JOE.21859. ISSN 1932-2054. Wikidata Q56622208.

Westerman, G; Bonnet, D; McAfee, A (2014). Leading Digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.

Imschloss, M. “The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain”. International Journal of Research in Marketing.

“La Transformación digital desde la arquitectura empresarial”. Retrieved 22 August 2021.

“The Company Cultures That Help (or Hinder) Digital Transformation”. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 12 January 2017.

“Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation”. 2015-07-14. Retrieved 2016-01-18.

“The case for digital reinvention”. Retrieved 2021-09-01.

Groover, Mikell (2014). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems.

Rifkin, Jeremy (1995). The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era. Putnam Publishing Group. pp. 66, 75. ISBN 978-0-87477-779-6.

Lyshevski, S.E. Electromechanical Systems and Devices 1st Edition. CRC Press, 2008. ISBN 1420069721.

Lamb, Frank. Industrial Automation: Hands On (English Edition). NC, McGraw-Hill Education, 2013. ISBN 978-0071816458

The Changing Nature of Work (Report). The World Bank. 2019.

Dashevsky, Evan (8 November 2017). “How Robots Caused Brexit and the Rise of Donald Trump”. PC Magazine. Archived from the original on 8 November 2017.

Torrance, Jack (25 July 2017). “Robots for Trump: Did automation swing the US election?”. Management Today.

Harris, John (29 December 2016). “The lesson of Trump and Brexit: a society too complex for its people risks everything | John Harris”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077.

Darrell West (18 April 2018). “Will robots and AI take your job? The economic and political consequences of automation”. Brookings Institution.

Clare Byrne (7 December 2016). People are lost’: Voters in France’s ‘Trumplands’ look to far right”. The

Bennett 1993.

“Feedback and control systems” – JJ Di Steffano, AR Stubberud, IJ Williams. Schaums outline series, McGraw-Hill 1967

Mayr, Otto (1970). The Origins of Feedback Control. Clinton, MA USA: The Colonial Press, Inc.

Bennett, Stuart (1992). A history of control engineering, 1930–1955. IET. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-86341-299-8.

The elevator example is commonly used in programming texts, such as Unified modeling language

“MOTOR STARTERS START STOPS HAND OFF AUTO”. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 14 September 2013.

Guarnieri, M. (2010). “The Roots of Automation Before Mechatronics”. IEEE Ind. Electron. M. 4 (2): 42–43. doi:10.1109/MIE.2010.936772. S2CID 24885437.

Ahmad Y Hassan, Transfer Of Islamic Technology To The West, Part II: Transmission Of Islamic Engineering Archived 18 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine

J. Adamy & A. Flemming (November 2004), “Soft variable-structure controls: a survey” (PDF), Automatica, 40 (11): 1821–1844, doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2004.05.017

Otto Mayr (1970). The Origins of Feedback Control, MIT Press.

Donald Routledge Hill, “Mechanical Engineering in the Medieval Near East”, Scientific American, May 1991, p. 64-69.

“Charting the Globe and Tracking the Heavens”.

Bellman, Richard E. (8 December 2015). Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400874668.

Bennett, S. (1979). A History of Control Engineering 1800–1930. London: Peter Peregrinus Ltd. pp. 47, 266. ISBN 978-0-86341-047-5.

Bennett 1979

Bronowski, Jacob (1990) [1973]. The Ascent of Man. London: BBC Books. p. 265. ISBN 978-0-563-20900-3.

Liu, Tessie P. (1994). The Weaver’s Knot: The Contradictions of Class Struggle and Family Solidarity in Western France, 1750–1914. Cornell University Press. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-8014-8019-5.

Jacobson, Howard B.; Joseph S. Roueek (1959). Automation and Society. New York, NY: Philosophical Library. p. 8.

Hounshell, David A. (1984), From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 978-0-8018-2975-8, LCCN 83016269, OCLC 1104810110

Partington, Charles Frederick (1 January 1826). “A course of lectures on the Steam Engine, delivered before the Members of the London Mechanics’ Institution … To which is subjoined, a copy of the rare … work on Steam Navigation, originally published by J. Hulls in 1737. Illustrated by … engravings”.

Britain), Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce (Great (1 January 1814). “Transactions of the Society Instituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce”.

Bennett 1993, pp. 31

Field, Alexander J. (2011). A Great Leap Forward: 1930s Depression and U.S. Economic Growth. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-15109-1.

“INTERKAMA 1960 – Dusseldorf Exhibition of Automation and Instruments” (PDF). Wireless World. 66 (12): 588–589. December 1960. […] Another point noticed was the widespread use of small-package solid-state logic (such as “and,” “or,” “not“) and instrumentation (timers, amplifiers, etc.) units. There would seem to be a good case here for the various manufacturers to standardise practical details such as mounting, connections and power supplies so that a SiemensSimatic,” say, is directly interchangeable with an Ateliers des Constructions Electronique de CharleroiLogacec,” a TelefunkenLogistat,” or a MullardNorbit” or “Combi-element.” […]

“les relais statiques Norbit”. Revue MBLE (in French). September 1962. Archived from the original on 18 June 2018. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

Estacord – Das universelle Bausteinsystem für kontaktlose Steuerungen (Catalog) (in German). Herxheim/Pfalz, Germany: Akkord-Radio GmbH [de].

Klingelnberg, W. Ferdinand (2013) [1967, 1960, 1939]. Pohl, Fritz; Reindl, Rudolf (eds.). Technisches Hilfsbuch (in German) (softcover reprint of 15th hardcover ed.). Springer-Verlag. p. 135. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-88367-5. ISBN 978-3-64288368-2. LCCN 67-23459. 0512.

Parr, E. Andrew (1993) [1984]. Logic Designer’s Handbook: Circuits and Systems (revised 2nd ed.). B.H. Newnes / Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. / Reed International Books. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-0-7506-0535-9.

Weißel, Ralph; Schubert, Franz (7 March 2013) [1995, 1990]. “4.1. Grundschaltungen mit Bipolar- und Feldeffekttransistoren”. Digitale Schaltungstechnik. Springer-Lehrbuch (in German) (reprint of 2nd ed.). Springer-Verlag. p. 116. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-78387-6. ISBN 978-3-540-57012-7.

Walker, Mark John (8 September 2012). The Programmable Logic Controller: its prehistory, emergence and application (PDF) (PhD thesis). Department of Communication and Systems Faculty of Mathematics, Computing and Technology: The Open University. pp. 223, 269, 308. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 June 2018.

Rifkin 1995

Jerome, Harry (1934). Mechanization in Industry, National Bureau of Economic Research (PDF).

Constable, George; Somerville, Bob (1964). A Century of Innovation: Twenty Engineering Achievements That Transformed Our Lives. Joseph Henry Press. ISBN 978-0309089081.

“The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Designates the Owens “AR” Bottle Machine as an International Historic Engineering Landmark”. 1983. Archived from the original on 18 October 2017.

Bennett 1993, pp. 7

Landes, David. S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge, New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. p. 475. ISBN 978-0-521-09418-4.

Bennett 1993, pp. 65Note 1

Musson; Robinson (1969). Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution. University of Toronto Press.

Lamb, Frank (2013). Industrial Automation: Hands on. pp. 1–4.

Arnzt, Melanie (14 May 2016). “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS”. ProQuest 1790436902.

“Process automation, retrieved on 20.02.2010”. Archived from the original on 17 May 2013.

Bartelt, Terry. Industrial Automated Systems: Instrumentation and Motion Control. Cengage Learning, 2010.

Bainbridge, Lisanne (November 1983). “Ironies of automation”. Automatica. 19 (6): 775–779. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8.

Kaufman, Josh. “Paradox of Automation – The Personal MBA”.

“Children of the Magenta (Automation Paradox, pt. 1) – 99% Invisible”.

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics and Their Impact on the Workplace.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: