According to recent Cognizant-sponsored research, to boost digital usage and member loyalty, healthcare payers need to prioritize investments in analytics, awareness, strategy and design, say Bill Shea and Jagan Ramachandran, leaders in Cognizant’s Healthcare practice.
From our perspective, these lagging adoption rates are a result of payers underinvesting in awareness campaigns, analytics, strategy and design. Here are the steps payers can take to address these critical components of successful digital adoption.
1. Aggressively promote awareness of digital capabilities.
Our research over the last six years has shown increasing enthusiasm among members for conducting health plan transactions digitally. Yet even when health plans build desired digital features, members don’t use them. Our current survey shows that in 2020, when telehealth use was growing by 24%, 39% of plan members used telehealth capabilities — but from third-party service providers, not their health plans. At least one reason why is that 40% of members said they didn’t know their plans offered a telehealth option.
Payers must close these awareness gaps. Many do a poor job of promoting the tools they have and/or bury them several layers deep on their websites and don’t push them out to members when/where they need them most.
While payers often tell us, members don’t interact with them frequently enough to learn about their digital capabilities, the experience in the property and casualty insurance industry negates that excuse. The average consumer has far fewer property and auto claims in a year than they do healthcare claims. Yet P&C insurers enjoy much higher digital adoption rates than healthcare payers do, according to our research.
Why? P&C companies continually promote their apps and digital capabilities in their advertisements, websites, social feeds, etc. While they may use the apps infrequently, P&C customers do download them. Health insurers should similarly tout their digital capabilities in their marketing campaigns.
2. Make foundational investments in analytics.
Payers won’t get the value they expect from digital initiatives without strong analytics. Analytics and intelligence are prerequisites to anticipating member needs and prompting them to use a digital feature or other next best action in an app or on a website.
Analytics are also invaluable for learning about member needs. For example, most payers view call center deflection as a win. Analytics can help achieve that goal by learning from data about why and when members call for help so that payers can anticipate and proactively address those issues. If the data shows nine out of 10 members contacting the call center for updated deductible data after an emergency department visit, that function can be built into an app or website and advertised.
3. Adopt business-led strategy and design for each digital initiative.
Consumers today expect great digital experiences that payer tools don’t seem to deliver. However, health plan members reported unsatisfying experiences with payer tools, even when these tools offer self-service and other functions, they want most, such as provider search and cost estimation.
To avoid delivering disappointing member experiences, payers need to ensure the business, not IT, is leading these initiatives. In turn, the business must lead with in-depth strategy and design activities to ensure the digital capability meets actual member needs while creating business value.
Whereas business-led digital development follows a rigorous methodology that includes creating personas and journey maps and using outside-in analysis for examples of how other industries deliver similar solutions, IT-led development often starts with technology selection, and then fits processes to the technology’s capabilities. The business-led approach fully scopes out member needs first. These needs then drive the technology architecture design and technology selections so that the technology serves the business vision vs. defining it.
A large health plan we worked with took this approach to create new experiences for how brokers interact with members. We developed and designed personas, user journeys and eight future-state business processes before developing technology requirements.
4. Change funding mechanisms.
It’s accepted practice today to spend heavily on implementation while strategy and design efforts receive limited funds despite being prerequisites to successful outcomes. One organization we worked with was trying to build an industry-leading artificial intelligence model but lacked adequate budget to estimate ROI. Organizations must reallocate more budget to strategy and design efforts.
Advances in platform solutions that minimize customization needs support this funding shift. Organizations also must redefine how they identify OpEx and CapEx spend because many strategy and design efforts (e.g., journey maps, process models, business architecture, etc.) are critical to building required future capabilities and may be capitalized.
Our study revealed a number of immediate investment priorities for payers, including tools for estimating procedure costs, looking up benefits, searching for providers, finding plan options, reviews and features, checking on claims status, and calculating out-of-pocket expenses. But to realize high adoption and commensurate returns, payers must build these capabilities on a foundation of analytics and business-led strategy and design, followed by strong awareness campaigns.
By taking this approach, payers will set the stage for future member interactions that are more relational vs. transactional, such as health coaching, which will build loyalty and market share.
For more, read our report “Health Consumers Want Digital; It’s Time for Health Plans to Deliver,” produced in partnership with HFS Research.
William “Bill” Shea is a Vice-President within Cognizant Consulting’s Healthcare Practice. He has over 20 years of experience in management consulting, practice development and project management in the health industry across the payer, purchaser and provider markets. Bill has significant experience in health plan strategy and operations in the areas of digital transformation, integrated health management and product development. Bill can be reached at William.Shea@cognizant.com
- 2021). “Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23 (5): e23479. doi:10.2196/23479. PMC 8167621. PMID 33835034.
- Fadahunsi KP, Akinlua JT, O’Connor S, Wark PA, Gallagher J, Carroll C, et al. (March 2019). “Protocol for a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of information quality frameworks in eHealth”. BMJ Open. 9 (3): e024722. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722. PMC 6429947. PMID 30842114.
- Chen CE, Harrington RA, Desai SA, Mahaffey KW, Turakhia MP (June 2019). “Characteristics of Digital Health Studies Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 179 (6): 838–840. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7235. PMC 6547144. PMID 30801617.
- Bhavnani SP, Narula J, Sengupta PP (May 2016). “Mobile technology and the digitization of healthcare”. European Heart Journal. 37 (18): 1428–38. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv770. PMC 4914890. PMID 26873093.
- “WHO | Global diffusion of eHealth: Making universal health coverage achievable”. WHO. Retrieved 5 November 2020.
- O’Donoghue J, Herbert J (1 October 2012). “Data Management within mHealth Environments: Patient Sensors, Mobile Devices, and Databases”. Journal of Data and Information Quality. 4 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1145/2378016.2378021. S2CID 2318649.
- Widmer RJ, Collins NM, Collins CS, West CP, Lerman LO, Lerman A (April 2015). “Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 90 (4): 469–80. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.12.026. PMC 4551455. PMID 25841251.
- “Digital health”. US Food and Drug Administration. 19 July 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- Mclaughlin M, Delaney T, Hall A, Byaruhanga J, Mackie P, Grady A, et al. (February 2021). “Associations Between Digital Health Intervention Engagement, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23 (2): e23180. doi:10.2196/23180. PMC 8011420. PMID 33605897.
- Donkin L, Christensen H, Naismith SL, Neal B, Hickie IB, Glozier N (August 2011). “A systematic review of the impact of adherence on the effectiveness of e-therapies”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 13 (3): e52. doi:10.2196/jmir.1772. PMC 3222162. PMID 21821503.
- Perez-Uribe R, Salcedo-Perez C, Ocampo-Guzman D (13 April 2018). Handbook of Research on Intrapreneurship and Organizational Sustainability in SMEs. IGI Global. ISBN 9781522535447.
- Topol EJ (2012). The Creative Destruction of Medicine: How the Digital Revolution Will Create Better Health Care. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02550-3. OCLC 868260493 – via Internet Archive.
- Iyawa GE, Herselman M, Botha A (2016). “Digital Health Innovation Ecosystems: From Systematic Literature Review to Conceptual Framework”. Procedia Computer Science. 100: 244–252. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.149.
- El-Miedany Y (1 January 2017). “Telehealth and telemedicine: how the digital era is changing standard health care”. Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth. 4: 43–52. doi:10.2147/SHTT.S116009.
- Amft O (January 2018). “How Wearable Computing Is Shaping Digital Health”. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 17 (1): 92–98. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2018.011591067. ISSN 1558-2590. S2CID 3921043.
- Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, et al. (September 2002). “Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke”. Physical Therapy. 82 (9): 898–915. doi:10.1093/ptj/82.9.898. PMID 12201804.
- Monaghesh E, Hajizadeh A (August 2020). “The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence”. BMC Public Health. 20 (1): 1193. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4. PMC 7395209. PMID 32738884.
- Byaruhanga J, Atorkey P, McLaughlin M, Brown A, Byrnes E, Paul C, et al. (September 2020). “Effectiveness of Individual Real-Time Video Counseling on Smoking, Nutrition, Alcohol, Physical Activity, and Obesity Health Risks: Systematic Review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22 (9): e18621. doi:10.2196/18621. PMC 7519427. PMID 32915156.
- Rich E, Miah A (2 January 2017). “Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: towards a critical research agenda” (PDF). Health Sociology Review. 26 (1): 84–97. doi:10.1080/14461242.2016.1211486. ISSN 1446-1242. S2CID 151558809.
- Klinker K, Wiesche M, Krcmar H (25 June 2019). “Digital Transformation in Health Care: Augmented Reality for Hands-Free Service Innovation”. Information Systems Frontiers. 22 (6): 1419–1431. doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09937-7. ISSN 1572-9419. S2CID 195330313.
- Chang V (November 2017). “Computational Intelligence for Medical Imaging Simulations”. Journal of Medical Systems. 42 (1): 10. doi:10.1007/s10916-017-0861-x. PMID 29177790. S2CID 13049464.
- Silva BM, Rodrigues JJ, de la Torre Díez I, López-Coronado M, Saleem K (August 2015). “Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015”. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 56: 265–72. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003. PMID 26071682.
- Jiang T, Liang R, Wang Q, Bao Y (March 2018). “Speech Noise Reduction Algorithm in Digital Hearing Aids Based on an Improved Sub-band SNR Estimation”. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing. 37 (3): 1243–1267. doi:10.1007/s00034-017-0605-7. ISSN 0278-081X. S2CID 3484142.
- Fritz F, Tilahun B, Dugas M (March 2015). “Success criteria for electronic medical record implementations in low-resource settings: a systematic review”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 22 (2): 479–88. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocu038. PMID 25769683.
- “Progress in Canada”. Canada Health Infoway. 2016. Archived from the original on 12 November 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
- Collier R (January 2015). “National Physician Survey: EMR use at 75%”. CMAJ. 187 (1): E17–E18. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4957. PMC 4284187. PMID 25487665.
- Källander K, Tibenderana JK, Akpogheneta OJ, Strachan DL, Hill Z, ten Asbroek AH, et al. (January 2013). “Mobile health (mHealth) approaches and lessons for increased performance and retention of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a review”. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 15 (1): e17. doi:10.2196/jmir.2130. PMC 3636306. PMID 23353680.
- “Topol review”. Health Education England. 21 February 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- “The Topol Review”. The Topol Review – NHS Health Education England. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- “National Institutes of Health (NIH)”. National Institutes of Health (NIH) — All of Us. 1 June 2020. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
- Plattner H, Schapranow MP, eds. (2013). High-Performance In-Memory Genome Data Analysis. Springer.
- Benjamin K, Potts HW (27 February 2018). “Digital transformation in government: Lessons for digital health?”. Digital Health. 4: 2055207618759168. doi:10.1177/2055207618759168. PMC 6005404. PMID 29942624.
- FDA (26 September 2019). “Examples of Software Functions for Which the FDA Will Exercise Enforcement Discretion”. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health (16 April 2020). “Enforcement Policy for Digital Health Devices For Treating Psychiatric Disorders During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency”. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- Agrawal R, Prabakaran S (April 2020). “Big data in digital healthcare: lessons learnt and recommendations for general practice”. Heredity. 124 (4): 525–534. doi:10.1038/s41437-020-0303-2. PMC 7080757. PMID 32139886.
- Daniel Essin MA (6 February 2012). “Improve EHR Systems by Rethinking Medical Billing”. Physicians Practice. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- Gawande A. “Why Doctors Hate Their Computers”. The New Yorker. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health (22 September 2020). “What is Digital Health?”. FDA.
- Torous J, Roberts LW (May 2017). “Needed Innovation in Digital Health and Smartphone Applications for Mental Health: Transparency and Trust”. JAMA Psychiatry. 74 (5): 437–438. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0262. PMID 28384700.
- Sharon T (1 July 2018). “When digital health meets digital capitalism, how many common goods are at stake?”. Big Data & Society. 5 (2): 2053951718819032. doi:10.1177/2053951718819032. ISSN 2053-9517. S2CID 150255521.
- Larson DB, Magnus DC, Lungren MP, Shah NH, Langlotz CP (June 2020). “Ethics of Using and Sharing Clinical Imaging Data for Artificial Intelligence: A Proposed Framework”. Radiology. 295 (3): 675–682. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020192536. PMID 32208097.
- Lupton D (2014). “Critical Perspectives on Digital Health Technologies”. Sociology Compass. 8 (12): 1344–1359. doi:10.1111/soc4.12226. ISSN 1751-9020.
- Becker S, Miron-Shatz T, Schumacher N, Krocza J, Diamantidis C, Albrecht UV (May 2014). “mHealth 2.0: Experiences, Possibilities, and Perspectives”. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2 (2): e24. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3328. PMC 4114478. PMID 25099752.
- Lloyd-Sherlock PG, Ebrahim S, McKee M, Prince MJ (August 2016). “Institutional ageism in global health policy”. BMJ. 354: i4514. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4514. PMID 27582131. S2CID 41312322.
- “The Effect of Ageism on the Digital Divide Among Older Adults”. heraldopenaccess.us. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
- Loader BD (13 January 2009). Loader B, Hardey M, Keeble L (eds.). Digital Welfare for the Third Age. doi:10.4324/9780203886533. ISBN 9780203886533.
- “Eighth Broadband Progress Report”. Federal Communications Commission. 21 August 2012. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
- “Press Release”. http://www.itu.int. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
- Dunn P, Hazzard E (October 2019). “Technology approaches to digital health literacy”. International Journal of Cardiology. 293: 294–296. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.039. PMID 31350037.
- “The rise of the bio-surveillance state”. http://www.newstatesman.com. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
- “Coronavirus bio-surveillance around the globe”. Big Think. 27 March 2020. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
- Solove DJ (4 April 2013). “HIPAA Turns 10: Analyzing the Past, Present, and Future Impact”. Rochester, NY. SSRN 2245022.
- Miron-Scahtz T, Elwyn G (30 June 2011). “To serve and protect? Electronic health records pose challenges for privacy, autonomy and person-centered medicine”. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine. 1 (2): 405–409. doi:10.5750/ijpcm.v1i2.84. Sharon T (July 2020). “Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech’s newfound role as global health policy makers”. Ethics and Information Technology: 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x. PMC 7368642. PMID 32837287.