Strong Buyout Fund Returns Drive Private Equity Stocks Higher

Private equity

Over the past decade, as private equity firms like Blackstone, KKR and Carlyle Group have grown into a gargantuan size and raised buyout funds nearing or eclipsing $20 billion, one critique of their cash gusher was that it would inevitably drive fund returns lower. Now, as the U.S. economy emerges from the Coronavirus pandemic and markets soar to new record highs, recent earning results from America’s big buyout firms reveal a trend of rising returns even as funds surged in size.

Fueled by piping-hot financial markets, returns from the flagship private equity funds of Blackstone, KKR and Carlyle are on the rise. Mega funds from these firms that recently ended their investment period are all running ahead of their prior vintages and raise the prospect that PE firms can achieve net investment return rates nearing or exceeding 20%.

Carlyle, which reported first quarter earnings on Thursday morning, is the newest firm to exhibit rising performance. Its $13 billion North American buyout fund, Carlyle Partners VI, which was launched in 2014 and ended its investment period in 2018, is now being marked at a 21% gross investment rate of return and a net return of 16%, or a 2.2-times multiple on invested capital.

The fund has realized $8.8 billion of investments, like insurance brokerage PIB Group and consultancy PA Consulting, and sits on a portfolio marked at nearly $20 billion. The returns are two-to-three percentage points ahead of Carlyle Partners V, the flagship buyout fund it raised just before the financial crisis. That fund is on track to earn a net IRR of of 14%, or a multiple of 2.1-times its invested capital.

Rising fund profitability, even at scale, is helping to fuel Carlyle’s overall profitability. Net accrued performance fees from Carlyle VI ended the quarter at nearly $1.4 billion and Carlyle sits on a record $3.2 billion in such performance fees that will likely be fully realized in 2021. The firm’s once-lagging stock has recently risen to new record highs.

The trend is even more clear at Blackstone and KKR, which have both used spongy IPO markets to realize multi-billion dollar investment windfalls in recent months.

Blackstone’s flagship $18 billion private equity fund, Blackstone Capital Partners VII, was closed in May 2016 and ended its investment period in February 2020, just before the Covid-19 economic meltdown. After taking public or exiting investments like Bumble, Paysafe and Refinitiv, this fund is now marked at a 18% net investment rate of return, five percentage points better than its prior fund, which raised in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis.

In the past two quarters, the fund has been the single biggest driver of Blackstone’s record profitability, generating over $1.6 billion in combined accrued performance fees. In the first quarter, the fund was responsible for 82-cents in quarterly per-share profits, filings show. Overall, Blackstone sits on a record $5.2 billion in net accrued performance fees.

At KKR, it’s a similar story. The firm’s $8.8 billion Americas XI fund, which was raised in 2012 and ended its investment period in 2017, is generating net IRRs of 18.5%, or a 2.2-times multiple on invested capital, according to the its annual 10-k filing from February. That sets up the fund to be KKR’s most profitable buyout fund since the 1990s.

KKR’s first quarter results, set to be released in early May, may show even bigger windfalls and higher returns. Its recent public offering of Applovin looks to be one of the greatest windfalls in the firm’s history, bolstering returns and profits for its even newer $13.5 billion Americas Fund XII. Asia could also be an area of big returns as its $9 billion Asian Fund III monetizes investments.

As returns rise, PE firms have seen their stocks soar to new record highs.

Once a laggard, Carlyle is up 36% year-to-date to a new record high above $42, according to Morningstar data. The firm, now led by chief executive Kewsong Lee, has returned an annual average of 23% over the past five-years.

KKR has done even better, rising 40% this year alone and 125% over the past 12-months. It’s five and ten-year total stock returns are now 33% and 13.5%, respectively.

The top performer in the industry is Blackstone Group, which recently eclipsed a $100 billion market value. Up 39% this year alone, Blackstone’s generated an average annualized total return of nearly 19% over the past decade, which is about five-percentage-points better annually than the S&P 500 Index.

Bottom Line: With public markets hitting new record highs, buyout firms are reporting LBO returns not seen since the 1990s. Their stocks, which once badly lagged the S&P 500, are beginning to beat the market.

I’m a staff writer and associate editor at Forbes, where I cover finance and investing. My beat includes hedge funds, private equity, fintech, mutual funds, mergers, and banks. I’m a graduate of Middlebury College and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, and I’ve worked at TheStreet and Businessweek. Before becoming a financial scribe, I was a member of the fateful 2008 analyst class at Lehman Brothers. Email thoughts and tips to agara@forbes.com. Follow me on Twitter at @antoinegara

Source: Strong Buyout Fund Returns Drive Private Equity Stocks Higher

.

More Links:

Bitcoin Surpasses $15,000 To Reach Fresh 2020 High

Bitcoin prices extended their recent gains today, continuing to rally and breaking through the $15,000 level to hit a new high for this year.The world’s most prominent digital currency reached $15,306.84 at 11:15 a.m. EST on CoinDesk.

At this point, the cryptocurrency was up close to 10% over roughly the last 24 hours, additional CoinDesk figures reveal.The digital asset has been enjoying a great run this year, climbing more than 200% after falling below $4,000 back in March.

Ed note: Investing in cryptocoins or tokens is highly speculative and the market is largely unregulated. Anyone considering it should be prepared to lose their entire investment.

Price Drivers

When explaining bitcoin’s latest price movements, analysts pointed to several variables, including uncertainty surrounding the U.S. election.

“Bitcoin has broken through the $15,000 mark,” causing it to reach a multi-year high, said Charles Hayter, cofounder and CEO of digital currency data platform CryptoCompare. Recommended For You

“The surge comes at a time when Europe enters its second lockdown, the dollar continues to weaken and stock markets are rallying on the back of the US presidential election.”John Todaro, director of institutional research for TradeBlock, pointed to similar variables when interpreting bitcoin’s latest gains.

PROMOTED Grads of Life BrandVoice | Paid Program Why Employers Should Connect To Opportunity Youth In 2021 UNICEF USA BrandVoice | Paid Program Community Health Workers Are Yemen’s Superheroes Civic Nation BrandVoice | Paid Program Three Types Of Misinformation In This Election And How We Can Fight It

“Equity markets have likewise risen alongside bitcoin as expectations of increased fiscal stimulus have risen—increased stimulus will devalue the dollar but push up equities and bitcoin as was expected in the event of a Biden win,” he stated.

Joe DiPasquale, CEO of cryptocurrency hedge fund manager BitBull Capital, offered a different point of view, describing bullish sentiment as the main driver of the digital currency’s latest gains.

The Path To $20,000

Now that bitcoin has broken through $15,000, analysts have started eyeing the $20,000 price level, speculating on when the cryptocurrency will reach a fresh, all-time high.Denis Vinokourov, head of research for London-based digital asset firm Bequant, commented on this situation.

“Bitcoin continues to grind ever so higher and, while calls for a re-test of the all-time high continue to grow ever so louder, parabolic price runs are not necessarily what the market needs for growth to be sustainable,” he stated.

“A correction and capital rotation into mid and small-cap assets, at this stage, would prove healthy for the overall marketplace.”“However, given the aforementioned FOMO and growing demand from retail, most signs point to a further squeeze higher,” said Vinokourov.

“Thus, ultimately, all eyes are on the elusive $20,000 price level, with little price discovery data to note any key levels – resistance or otherwise.”

Disclosure: I own some bitcoin, bitcoin cash, litecoin, ether and EOS. Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn.

Charles Bovaird

 Charles Bovaird

I am a financial writer and editor with strong knowledge of asset markets and investing concepts. Currently, I serve as VP of Content for financial services firm Quantum Economics. I have worked for financial institutions including State Street, Moody’s Analytics and Citizens Commercial Banking. An author of more than 500 publications, my work has appeared in mediums such as New York Post, Washington Post, Fortune, CoinDesk and Investopedia. Previously, I created all the industrial finance training for a company with more than 300 people. I have spoken at industry events across the world and delivered speeches on financial literacy for Mensa and Boston Rotaract. I currently hold Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Ether and EOS.

.

.

The Crypto Analyst

Bitcoin flew through $10,000 today and set a new high! When wondering how high BTC can go? I do a Bitcoin technical analysis to show where I think this Bitcoin price prediction can really go to in 2020. Don’t Forget To LIKE, COMMENT, And SUBSCRIBE! Discord: https://discord.gg/DxuatMP TA COURSE: https://www.udemy.com/user/the-crypto… Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=10921422 Donate: https://streamlabs.com/thecryptoanalyst Donate Bitcoin: 15BJPmtMDVZVvep238TrXtTdyvJFj5tXQ8 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thecryptoan… Twitter: https://twitter.com/ACryptoAnalyst?la… Coinbase: $10 of FREE BITCOIN After Signing Up And Buying At Least $100 – https://www.coinbase.com/join/5a3e068… Binance: $10 of FREE BITCOIN After Signing Up And Buying At Least $100 – https://www.binance.com/?ref=16926559

advertisement

The Funds With The Smartest Investors, And The Funds With The Dumbest

1

Are mutual fund investors impulsive? Do they jump into a fund after a winning streak and then sell out, in despair, after a bad stretch?

I tested this hypothesis by going to Morningstar MORN , the securities analysis outfit in Chicago. The Morningstar Direct database, the version of its service sold to investment pros, has performance details that shed light on timing decisions by fund buyers.

The answer to the question: Yes, fund clients are impulsive. Bad timing causes them to earn considerably less than they would have earned by buying and holding. On funds of domestic stocks, they’re throwing away something like $54 billion a year.

The key to this analysis is a number that Morningstar calls “investor return.” It measures the average results taken home, as opposed to the performance of the fund.

The usual performance number reported for a fund assumes a hypothetical buyer putting a single sum of money in at the beginning and leaving it untouched until the end of some measurement period, like a decade. Example: The Schwab 1000 Index fund delivered a 233% cumulative performance over the ten years to May 31. That amounts to a compound annual 12.8%.

The investor return on this index fund is a bit less, at 12.6%. This figure takes into account the monthly flows of money into and out of the fund. More precisely: If fund shareholders had been earning a constant 12.6% on every dollar they kept in play, they would have wound up with the fund’s ending assets. In short, the 12.6% measures average investor experience.

Where does the 0.2% shortfall come from? It means that buyers of this fund had a slight tendency to add money, or to take it off the table, at the wrong times. We’re human. After a bullish run we’re in love with stocks and buy more—maybe near a top. A correction in stocks makes bonds more appealing and we hold back, just when stocks are a bargain.

The mistakes among Schwab’s clientele pale in comparison to those of fund buyers generally. Morningstar has 827 domestic-stock funds with both ten years of history and sufficient detail on asset balances to permit a calculation of investor return. At 527 of those funds, not quite two-thirds of them, timing decisions lowered the annualized gains experienced.

bitmax2

Among all 827 funds the average impact, with both positive and negative impacts included, was a loss of 0.64% a year. Keep that up for 30 years and you shortchange a $1 million retirement portfolio by $175,000.

It is important to understand what Morningstar is measuring. A shortfall does not occur when a customer is invested for only a portion of the ten-year period, since both the reported performance figure and the investor return are compound annual percentages. (Morningstar’s investor number is an internal rate of return. For an explanation of how that arithmetic works, see this article on how to compare your results to a yardstick.)

A shortfall will show up, though, if people jump into a style or sector after an upswing, only to be disappointed and then move into another kind of fund that seems to be the new ticket to wealth. Such performance chasing depresses investor returns at both funds.

Some funds have customers who are either lucky or smart. Their timing is good. They do better than the performance figures indicate.

These ten funds all beat the market, as measured by the Schwab index fund, and had customers who improved on those good results by being invested at the right times:

Noteworthy on this list are two funds from the Kayne Anderson Rudnick subsidiary of Virtus Investment Partners VRTS . KAR leans toward concentrated, quirky portfolios of stocks like Teladoc Health and Morningstar. (Forbes profile here.)

Winning funds with well-timed investor moves are the exception. More common: funds where investor flailing depresses gains. These ten underperformed the market and had customers who magnified the damage with their stumbling:

I asked the operators of the second group of funds for comments and got one, from Needham:

“Our mission is to create wealth for long-term investors. Those who trade mutual funds or try to time the market may see returns that are less than those who stay invested and have been rewarded with excellent long-term returns.”

Moral of this story on investor returns: Follow Needham’s advice. Invest with enough conviction that you can stay put.

And if your attention is fleeting? Maybe you should discontinue the search for market beaters and just own an index fund.

Here’s one more statistic from that Morningstar data set. The average investor experience in the 827 funds was a compound annual 10.5%. That’s 2.3 points less than the return on the Schwab 1000 fund. This shortfall comes from both bad timing by customers and a parallel flailing by the funds. In their struggle to beat the market the fund managers ran up trading costs as well as their own management expenses.

Yes, 2.3% is a gigantic loss. Keep it up for 30 years and you cut your $1 million retirement in half.

Follow me on Twitter.

I aim to help you save on taxes and money management costs. I graduated from Harvard in 1973, have been a journalist for 45 years, and was editor of Forbes magazine from 1999 to 2010. Tax law is a frequent subject in my articles. I have been an Enrolled Agent since 1979. Email me at williambaldwinfinance — at — gmail — dot — com.

Source: https://www.forbes.com

GM-980x120-BIT-ENG-Banner

728x90

Many investors have bad habits that keep them from becoming as wealthy as they could be. A lot of times, people aren’t even aware of their own bad habits. If you want to be the best investor you can be then watch out for these investing mistakes. http://bit.ly/2IWg0jE
%d bloggers like this: