South Korean prosecutors are seeking to freeze 3,313 bitcoins at two cryptocurrency exchanges allegedly tied to luna founder Do Kwon. The coins were moved soon after a South Korean court issued an arrest warrant for the Terraform Labs co-founder. Luna Foundation Guard has denied transferring the coins. Korean Authorities Ask Crypto Exchanges to Freeze Bitcoin.
South Korean authorities have reportedly asked cryptocurrency exchanges Kucoin and Okx to freeze 3,313 bitcoins allegedly tied to Terraform Labs co-founder Kwon Do-hyung, also known as Do Kwon. The coins were transferred to the trading platforms soon after a warrant was issued for Kwon’s arrest in South Korea.
On Tuesday, an official at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office confirmed to Bloomberg that requests have been sent to the two cryptocurrency exchanges to freeze the 3,313 BTC.
The coins were transferred to the trading platforms from a wallet allegedly linked to Luna Foundation Guard (LFG) that was created on Sept. 15, according to crypto researcher Cryptoquant. The researcher told the publication: Cryptoquant specified new bitcoin addresses owned by LFG based on transaction patterns, adjacent flows and material non-public information.
However, Luna Foundation Guard denied the allegation Tuesday evening. The group tweeted its treasury’s bitcoin address, adding: “LFG hasn’t created any new wallets or moved BTC or other tokens held by LFG since May 2022.” Do Kwon Says: ‘I’m Making Zero Effort to Hide’
The luna founder’s whereabouts are currently unknown. He was believed to be in Singapore but the Singapore police force said earlier this month that he is currently not in the city-state. Kwon has maintained that he is not “on the run,” tweeting Monday: I’m making zero effort to hide. I go on walks and malls.
The Seoul Metropolitan Police have asked various crypto exchanges to ban Luna’s capability of withdrawing company funds, the report said. It was not clear which exchanges were asked or whether they have complied. Terraform Labs lost $30 billion this month when Terra’s UST stablecoin and LUNA cryptocurrency went into a death spiral, costing investors billions globally.
The associated Luna Foundation Guard was charged with protecting UST’s peg using a war chest of billions of dollars in bitcoin (BTC); it ultimately failed. Terraform Labs CEO Do Kwon is already under the financial crimes microscope and is facing a tax evasion investigation by a South Korean police unit known as the “Grim Reaper.” Luna Foundation Guard did not respond to a request for comment by press time.
A South Korean court issued an arrest warrant for Kwon on Sept. 14. He is accused of fraud after the collapse of the cryptocurrency luna (now called luna classic (LUNC)) and stablecoin terrausd (UST). In addition, the country’s ministry of foreign affairs is reportedly planning to revoke his passport.
Moreover, Interpol has issued a Red Notice for the Terraform Labs co-founder. “A Red Notice is a request to law enforcement worldwide to locate and provisionally arrest a person pending extradition, surrender, or similar legal action,” Interpol’s website details, adding that “Red Notices are issued for fugitives wanted either for prosecution or to serve a sentence.”
By: Kevin Helms
A student of Austrian Economics, Kevin found Bitcoin in 2011 and has been an evangelist ever since. His interests lie in Bitcoin security, open-source systems, network effects and the intersection between economics and cryptography.
When the Luna crypto network collapsed, it’s estimated that $60 billion got wiped out of the digital currency space. Algorithmic stablecoins (UST) are not the same as Tether or USD Coin, which are backed by actual dollars or assets stored in a bank. An arrest warrant has been issued for Do Kwon, the co-founder of Terraform Labs, where the sister tokens Luna and TerraUSD were held.
Terra network and its leader, Do Kwon, rose to prominence in the cryptocurrency world over the course of four years, all ending in a disastrous fall from grace. The Luna crypto network collapsed in what’s considered the largest crypto crash ever, with an estimated $60 billion wipeout, shaking the global digital currency market.
There are two stories regarding Luna crypto: the TerraUSD/UST stablecoin and the actual Luna coin. Once Luna and UST crashed, there was a total liquidity crunch in the cryptocurrency space that caused an even more catastrophic loss of value. The crypto community still hasn’t recovered.
You may have heard of TerraUSD and Luna, here is a quick breakdown of what they are exactly. Lots of moving parts within the Luna network ahead of its collapse.TerraUSD (also known as UST) and Luna are two sister coins on the same network.
Terra is a blockchain network, similar to Ethereum or Bitcoin, that produces Luna tokens. The network was created in 2018 by Do Kwon and Daniel Shin of Terraform Labs. Terraform Labs created the UST coin to be an algorithmic stablecoin on the Terra network. While other stablecoins (USDC or Tether) are fiat-backed, the UST would not be backed by real assets. Instead, the value of UST would be backed by its sister token, Luna. More on that later.
Stablecoins are supposedly safe havens in the crypto space since they’re meant to have a fixed value of around 1 USD. The goal being, a steady store of value for investors, unlike other volatile coins (like ethereum).Luna was Terra’s blockchain native token, similar to how ether is used on the Ethereum network. Luna had four different roles in the Terra network:
A method to pay for transaction fees in the Terra network.
A mechanism for maintaining Terra’s stablecoin peg.
Staking in Terra’s delegated proof of stake (DPoS) to validate network transactions.
Participation in the platform’s governance by adding to and voting on proposals when it comes to changes in the Terra network.
How much was Luna worth?
A Luna coin was going for around $116 in April and ended up dropping to a fraction of a penny before being delisted. Before that, the coin went from being worth less than $1 in early 2021 to creating many crypto millionaires within a year. This led to Kwon’s cult hero status among (some) retail crypto investors. Many success stories popped up in the media about how regular folks were able to get rich from Luna.
The Luna token skyrocketed about 135% in less than two months until its peak in April 2022. The largest incentive was that you could stake your UST holdings on the Anchor lending platform for a 20% annual yield. Many analysts felt that this absurd rate was unsustainable.
The Anchor Protocol was a decentralized money market built on the Terra blockchain. This platform became popular for its aforementioned 20% yield for UST holders who deposited their tokens on the platform. Then Anchor would turn around and loan the deposit to another investor. Many skeptics were concerned about where the money came from to pay these rates. Some considered this an obvious Ponzi scheme. At one point, as much as 72% of UST was deposited in Anchor because the platform was the primary driver of demand for Terra.
What happened to UST?
Before we look at this crypto disaster, we need to discuss stablecoins briefly. A stablecoin is pegged to a more stable currency like the US dollar. Tether and USDC are both tied to USD. Stablecoins are used to hedge against volatility in the crypto space. For example, let’s say that Ether’s price is $1,000. You could exchange one Ether for 1,000 USDC tokens. When investors expect a hit in the crypto market, they put their money into stablecoins to protect their assets.
The UST coin was not backed by an actual US Dollar but rather an algorithmic stablecoin. The belief was that Terraform Labs could use clever mechanisms along with billions in Bitcoin reserves to maintain the peg of UST without the backstop of the USD. To create UST you have to burn Luna. So, for example, when Luna token’s price was $85, you could trade one token for 85 UST. This deflationary protocol was designed to ensure there was long-term growth for Luna.
For UST to retain its peg, one UST could be changed for $1 worth of Luna at any time. If UST slipped, traders could make money from buying UST and then exchanging it for Luna. Both Luna and UST crashed once UST lost its peg to the dollar, which was what qualified it as a stablecoin.
TerraUSD was risky because it wasn’t backed by cash, treasuries or other traditional assets like the popular stablecoin tether. The stability of UST was derived from algorithms that linked the value to Luna. Many experts were skeptical that an algorithm could keep two tokens stable.
Why did LUNA crash?
The Luna crypto crash was caused by its connection to TerraUSD (UST), the algorithmic stablecoin of the Terra network. On May 7, over $2 billion worth of UST was unstaked (taken off the Anchor Protocol), and hundreds of millions of it were quickly liquidated. There’s debate as to whether this happened as a response to rising interest rates or if it was a malicious attack on the Terra blockchain. The huge sell-offs brought down the price of UST to $0.91, from $1. As a result, traders started to change 90 cents worth of UST for $1 of Luna.
Once a large amount of UST had been offloaded, the stablecoin started to depeg. In a panic, more people sold off UST, which led to the minting of more Luna and an increase in the circulating supply of Luna. Following this crash, crypto exchanges started to delist Luna and UST pairings. Long story short, Luna was abandoned as it became worthless.
What happened after the Luna crash?
The Luna meltdown impacted the entire cryptocurrency market, which was already highly volatile and experiencing difficulty at the time. It’s estimated that the Luna crash ended up tanking the price of bitcoin and causing an estimated loss of $300 billion in value across the entire cryptocurrency space. Crypto leaders Voyager and Celsius filed for bankruptcy. Three Arrows Capital (3AC) was forced into liquidation.
Many people lost their life savings and suffered financial hardships due to the Luna crypto crash. If you do a quick search online, you’ll find many of these terrible stories. Many loyal Luna fans (who referred to themselves as “Lunatics”) took to Reddit threads to share their disastrous stories. One retail crypto investor even confessed that they lost their savings of $20,000 in Luna.
The only winners were those who exited their positions before the crash. One winner that we have to highlight is the hedge fund Pantera Capital. They saw a 100x return on an initial investment of $1.7 million. The company liquidated its Luna position prior to the collapse for a return of $171 million.
Yuri Popovich had watched his neighbours’ houses burn down to the ground in Kyiv and he needed a safe place to put his money. So he did what millions of amateur investors have done in recent years: he turned to cryptocurrency. “It was impossible and unsafe to store funds in the form of banknotes. There was a big risk of theft, we also had cases of looting. Therefore, I trusted a ‘stable and reliable’ cryptocurrency. Not for the purpose of speculating, but simply to save,” he says.
The digital asset that Popovich chose in April was terra, a “stablecoin” whose value was supposed to be pegged to the dollar. It collapsed in May, sparking a rout in the cryptocurrency market whose victims include Popovich. He lost $10,000 (£8,200). Popovich says his losses were “devastating”, although donations from sympathetic onlookers on social media have helped make up some of the shortfall. He says: “I stopped sleeping normally, lost 4kg, I often have headaches and anxiety.”
Popovich is one of many experiencing the deep chill of the current crypto winter, more than four years after the market’s cornerstone, bitcoin, marked the first digital freeze by tumbling from its then peak. It went on a long tear after that but it has come to a juddering halt, with bitcoin falling below the $20,000 mark at one point this month – far below its peak of nearly $69,000, which it hit last November.
The fall has been sharp and spectacular: an overall market that was estimated to be worth more than $3tn barely six months ago is now worth less than $1tn.
The beginnings of the latest crypto boom held all the hallmarks of being another instance of the “Robinhood economy”, named after the popular American stock trading app. Bored white collar workers, stuck at home because of pandemic lockdowns but awash with disposable income, turned to day trading as a way to pass the time. Subscribers to the r/WallStreetBets forum on the popular online discussion site Reddit doubled over the course of 2020 and then quadrupled in the first month of 2021, as a small army of retail investors flooded into assets as varied as the then bankrupt car rental company Hertz, the troubled video game retailer GameStop and the electric car manufacturer Tesla, pushing the latter from $85 at the beginning of the pandemic to a high of $1,243 towards the end of 2021.
Cryptocurrencies also benefited from the surge in day trading. Bitcoin soared from a low of $5,000 in March 2020 to more than $60,000 a year later. The currency has had that sort of precipitous increase before: in 2017, it had risen 20-fold, to its then peak of $19,000. But in the latest boom, ethereum, the number two cryptocurrency, had an even more impressive climb, from just $120 to a high of almost $5,000 in 2021.
Cryptocurrency is the name for any digital asset that works like bitcoin, the original cryptocurrency, which was invented in 2009. There is a “decentralised ledger”, which records who owns what, built into a “blockchain”, which secures the whole network by ensuring transactions are irreversible once made. In the years since then, a dizzying amount of variations have arisen, but the core – the blockchain concept – is remarkably stable, in part because of the social implications of truly decentralised networks being immune to government oversight or regulation.
Where, 10 years ago, people simply spoke of trading in bitcoin, the space has ballooned. As well as cryptocurrencies themselves, , the sector has developed in a complex ecosystem. It encompasses Web3, a broader selection of apps and services built on top of cryptocurrencies, DeFi, an attempt to bootstrap an entire financial sector out of code rather than contracts, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which use the same technology as cryptocurrencies to trade in objects rather than money.
The flood of money washing into the world of crypto did more than simply inflate the paper wealth of pre-existing shareholders. Instead, it led to a surge of interest in, and funding for, the vast array of projects that aimed to capitalise on the underlying technology of cryptocurrencies. For a generation of new investors, the “decentralised finance” opportunities of the sector were appealing. Built on top of the “programmable money” of the ethereum cryptocurrency, the “DeFi” [decentralised finance] sector is an attempt to expand bitcoin’s anti-establishment ethos to cover the entire economy.
Take the comparatively small sector of the crypto market known as NFTs. A product dating back to 2014, NFTs take the tech used to create cryptocurrencies, but let creators link unique assets to the blockchain, instead of money-like currencies. That means NFTs can be traded that represent works of art, virtual collectibles, or even function as tickets to events or membership of clubs. And like cryptocurrencies, they can be bought or sold in open exchanges, held pseudonymously, and packaged up or securitised in complex financial instruments.
One token, representing years of work by the digital artist Beeple, sold for $69m; another, linked to the first tweet sent by the Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, was bought for $2.9m. Individual NFTs in the Bored Ape Yacht Club collection – the most consistently desired examples of “profile pic” NFTs, designed to be used as pre-packaged online identity – regularly sold for $1m-$3m apiece. But by the beginning of 2022, the NFT bubble appeared to have already popped. “Floor” prices for large NFT collections had plummeted, and, while many large NFT acquisitions have stayed in private collection, those that have been put back on the market have fared poorly: the Dorsey tweet was withdrawn from sale after achieving a top bid of just $14,000.
And then: the crash
The crypto crisis has played out against the backdrop of wider market problems, as fears over the Ukraine conflict, rising inflation and higher borrowing costs stalk investors. Some market watchers play down the prospect of a crypto crash triggering serious problems elsewhere in the financial markets or the global economy. The total value of all cryptocurrencies is about $1tn currently (with bitcoin accounting for about 40% of the total), which compares with approximately $100tn for the world’s stock markets.
Since November the value of all cryptocurrencies has fallen from $3tn, meaning that $2tn worth of wealth has been wiped out, with no serious knock-on effects to the broader stock market – so far. Teunis Brosens, the head economist for digital finance at the Dutch bank ING, says the traditional financial system is relatively well shielded because established banks – the cornerstones of the financial world that buckled in 2008 – are not exposed to cryptocurrencies because they do not hold digital assets on their balance sheets, unlike during the financial crisis when they held toxic debt products related to the housing market.
“What has happened in the crypto market has caused great losses for some investors and it’s all very painful and not something I want to downplay,” he says. “But it would be overplaying the role that crypto currently has in the economic and financial system if you were to think there could be systemic consequences for the wider financial system or even a global recession directly caused by crypto assets.” To date, the turmoil has been limited to the crypto sector. Digital assets have been hit by some of the same economic issues that have affected the wider global economy and stock markets. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have been affected by concerns over rising inflation and the ensuing increases in interest rates by central banks, which has made risky assets less attractive to investors. This meant that as stock markets declined, so too did crypto assets.
But the collapse last month of terra also hit confidence in cryptocurrencies. In June, a cryptocurrency lender, Celsius, was forced to stop customer withdrawals. And a hedge fund that made big bets on the crypto markets slid towards liquidation. Crypto investors and firms that had made bets on the crypto market using digital assets as collateral were forced into a selling spree. Kim Grauer, the head of research at the cryptocurrency data firm Chainalysis, says: “It was a combination of the stock market plus the kind of excessive reaction that is typical of crypto markets because of these cascading liquidations. In this case the key event was terra.”
She added: “Crypto is not going away. And it has experienced crashes more severe than this crash.” Regulators and various government agencies are looking closely. Harry Eddis, the global co-head of fintech at Linklaters, a London-based law firm, says recent events in the crypto asset market will strengthen regulators’ determination to rein in the industry.“nI think it will certainly stiffen the sinews of the regulators in saying that they’re more than justified in regulating the industry, because of the obvious risks with a lot of the crypto assets out there,” he says.
In the UK, the financial watchdog continues to expand safeguards on crypto products. Its latest proposals on marketing crypto products to consumers could lead to significant restrictions on crypto exchanges operating in the UK. Consumers reported 4,300 potential crypto scams to the Financial Conduct Authority’s website over a six-month period last year, far ahead of the second place category, pension transfers, which had 1,600 reports. The FCA has 50 live investigations, including criminal inquiries, into companies in the sector.
The terra collapse has also heightened regulatory concerns about stablecoins, because they are backed by traditional assets and therefore could pose a risk to the wider financial system. In the UK, the Treasury wants a regime in place for dealing with a stablecoin collapse, saying in May that a terra-like failure could endanger the “continuity of services critical to the operation of the economy and access of individuals to their funds or assets”.
“Even just the top three stablecoins hold reserves totalling $140bn in traditional assets, much of this being in commercial paper and US treasuries. A run on redemptions of the largest coin (tether) could destabilise the entire crypto asset system and spill over into other markets,” says Carol Alexander, the professor of finance at University of Sussex Business School.
Elsewhere, the EU is drawing up a regulatory framework for crypto assets with the aim of introducing it by 2024, while in the US Joe Biden has signed an executive order directing the federal government to coordinate a regulatory plan for cryptocurrencies including ensuring “sufficient oversight and safeguard against any systemic financial risks posed by digital assets”. The Federal Trade Commission, the US consumer watchdog, says 46,000 people have lost more than $1bn to crypto scams since the start of 2021.
In general, regulators have been talking tough about cryptocurrencies. The chair of the FCA has called for “strong safeguards” to be put in place for the crypto market, while the head of the US financial regulator has warned consumers about crypto products promising returns that are “too good to be true”, while Singapore has said it will be “brutal and unrelentingly hard” on misbehaviour in the crypto market.
‘I’m sure crypto will bubble again’
Where crypto goes from here is an unanswerable question. For proponents, such as Changpeng Zhao, the multibillionaire owner of the Binance cryptocurrency exchange, the sector is sure to recover – though it might take some time. “I think given this price drop … it will probably take a while to get back,” he told the Guardian last week. “It probably will take a few months or a couple of years.”
For sceptics, however, the plummet could be a lasting wound. “Bitcoin will be around for decades,” says David Gerard, author of Attack of the 50-Foot Blockchain. “All you need is the software, the blockchain and two or more enthusiasts. Unless there’s new stringent regulation, I’m sure crypto will bubble again. But if there’s a genuine consumer bubble, it may not reach the heights of this one. The 2021-22 bubble made it to the Super Bowl. As many a dotcom found out 20 years ago, there’s nowhere to go from there – you’ve reached every consumer in America.”
But one thing both sides agree on is that the dividing line between “survivable downturn” and “cryptoapocalypse” is likely to involve neither bitcoin nor ethereum, but the third biggest cryptocurrency: a stablecoin called tether. Stablecoins are a foundational part of the crypto ecosystem. Their value is fixed to that of a conventional currency, allowing users to cash out of risky positions without going through the rigamarole of a bank transfer, and enabling crypto-native banks and DeFi establishments to work without taking on a currency risk.
In essence, stablecoins function like the banks of the crypto economy, allowing people to park their money safely in the knowledge that it is not exposed to wider risk. Which means that when a stablecoin collapses, it has a very similar effect to a bank failure: money disappears across the ecosystem, liquidity dries up, and other institutions begin to fail in a domino effect. The beginning of the latest crisis in crypto was sparked by exactly that: the failure of the terra/luna stablecoin. The algorithmic checks and balances put in place to keep it stable broke – triggering a death spiral.
And so on 9 May, a stablecoin called UST “depegged”, dropping from $1 to $0.75 in a day, and then falling further, and further and further. Within four days, the luna blockchain was turned off entirely, the project declared dead. A domino effect took out other crypto establishments. Some of the “contagion” has been prevented, in part through huge loans made by Alameda Ventures, the investment arm of 30-year-old crypto billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire. Drawing comparisons to JP Morgan in the panic of 1907, “SBF” has stepped in to support the crypto bank Voyager and the embattled exchange BlockFi, and been loudly calling for support from others.
Unlike terra, tether is a “centralised” stablecoin, maintaining its value through reserves which, the company says, are always redeemable one-to-one for a tether token. The model means it cannot enter a “death spiral” like terra, but also means the stability of the token is entirely a function of how much one trusts tether to actually maintain its reserves. That trust is not a sure thing. Tether once claimed to hold all its reserves in “US dollars”, a claim that the New York attorney general’s office concluded in 2021 was “a lie”.
Tether, and Bitfinex – a bitcoin exchange that shares an executive team with, but is legally distinct from, Tether – “recklessly and unlawfully covered-up massive financial losses to keep their scheme going and protect their bottom lines”, Letitia James, the New York attorney general, said at the time. The two companies had transferred money back and forth to cover up insolvency, she said, and had failed to ensure tether was “fully backed at all times”, the investigation concluded.“Te ther has been the timebomb under the market since 2017,” says Gerard.
“It has reduced its market cap by 15bn USDT in the last month, and has claimed that these are redemptions, or a reduction in their holdings of ‘commercial paper’,” she says, referring to one of the key assets that Tether uses on its balance sheet: commercial paper, short-term debt issued by banks and corporations to cover immediate funding needs. Tether, for its part, remains extremely bullish – and has even suggested it may publish a formal audit of its reserves, something it said was “months away” in August 2021.
In late June, Tether announced another expansion: the introduction of the first GBP stablecoin. “We believe that the UK is the next frontier for blockchain innovation and the wider implementation of cryptocurrency for financial markets,” says Paolo Ardoino, the chief technology officer of Tether and Bitfinex. “Tether is ready and willing to work with UK regulators to make this goal a reality.” More regulation, and further market volatility, are a given. Popovich says he is still receiving donations. “I’m extremely embarrassed. Yesterday an anonymous person sent me $50 in the form of cryptocurrency. And I’ve never borrowed anything from anyone in my life. I’m scared and restless.”
1. Let’s go back in time. What piqued your interest in cybersecurity in the first place?
While working for the government, Wilson saw how criminal activity (such as financial crime) often involved cybercrime, because criminals used digital technology as part of their crimes. While at the FBI Counterterrorism Division (CTD), Wilson observed that at some point everything became a cyber issue, because of digital technologies used for travel or recruiting.
2. How has your career path given you cybersecurity expertise?
Wilson started with the Department of Defense (DOD) as a special agent for the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). There he looked at various criminal activities and threats to the Department of Defense. He also worked in counter-terrorism. He says that starting 10-15 years ago, more of these activities were occurring online.
Next, Wilson went to the FBI Counterterrorism Division (CTD). He points out that travel and communication are mostly done online, and even many physical transactions (such as depositing money at a bank) leaves a digital footprint.
After that, Wilson was a liaison for the Department of Defense and Pacific Command (PACOM), looking at transnational organized crime. Here too he dealt with digital footprints.
Next Wilson went back to the FBI, dealing with nation-state cyber actors. He says these groups are very good at hiding who they are, and they use different tools and platforms to hide their tracks.
3. What are the biggest challenges or threats consumers face related to cybersecurity or digital privacy?
According to Wilson, the biggest challenge is that “you have no idea who is holding your data.” He explains that the company you’re giving your data to may share it with third parties.
Another challenge, says Wilson, is that you don’t know where your login credentials (username and password) are stored by organizations.
Wilson says that another challenge is that you don’t know that your data has become available to those who shouldn’t have it until it’s too late; you often don’t find out until a criminal uses your data or steals your identity.
4. What can people do about those challenges and threats?
Several times during the interview, Wilson recommended using an identity theft monitoring service.
Be vigilant about your passwords, advises Wilson. Don’t use the same password for multiple accounts. If you do that, and one account is breached, hackers can use that password to get into your other accounts. This is known as credential stuffing. He recommends that you make each password unique.
Wilson also recommends that you encrypt your passwords. A password manager can do this.
LastPass helps you remember and manage your secure passwords all in one place. Never forget a password again.We may earn a commission if you click this link and make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
5. How can parents protect their kids online, and help their kids protect themselves?
Because the threats to kids and adults are similar, Wilson advises that your entire family practice good cyber hygiene.
Wilson recommends that you monitor your kids, to know what sites they’re going to. He says you need to understand that kids click links without thinking carefully first. He points out that you can use apps for monitoring, and/or look at your router logs, or configure your router to block sites. The earlier you can educate kids about online safety, the better, says Wilson.
6. Let’s zoom in on identity theft. What are the most effective ways people can protect their identities?
Use an identity theft monitoring service, advises Wilson. Be vigilant, Wilson says, about who you’re giving access to your info. Be aware of scams that request personal info, which often spikes during tax season, says Wilson.
7. What are the biggest mistakes people make when using social media, which increases the risk of identity theft?
Posting photos that reveal your location, for example, a family photo that shows your address, is a mistake, says Wilson.
Don’t reveal that you’re traveling by posting about it, advises Wilson. Doing so tells criminals that it’s a good time to target your financial accounts, since you’re probably not closely watching your accounts while traveling. In addition to these dangers, says Wilson, high-net-worth individuals should be cautious of the threat of physical harm to themselves and their loved ones that can result from revealing their location or travel plans.
8. How much does a credit freeze help to reduce the risk of identity theft?
“I don’t know how effective it is,” says Wilson. “It’s more of a pain for you than it is for the cybercriminals, because they’ll find ways around it.” He explains that criminals can steal your identity or hurt you in other ways without getting access to your credit.
9. Is there anything people should do with their postal mail to reduce the risk of identity theft?
If you’ll be away from home, stop your mail, recommends Wilson.
I don’t think there’s a very large threat that way for identity theft.
Wilson explains that your address is already available online, without someone needing access to your mail to get it.
10. What steps should parents take to protect their kids’ identities?
Use an identity theft monitoring service for your kids, advises Wilson. He also recommends that you pay attention to the sites your kids are visiting and that you block sites as necessary, and educate your kids about online safety.
Wilson has seen identity theft happen to kids under 18. He says identity thieves can combine identity data from multiple sources to create a complete identity profile; for example, combining personal data from video games and data from the Equifax breach.
I won’t say they’re all very smart, but they’re very creative about how to monetize the data.
11. What should a person do if they suspect or know that their identity has been stolen?
Wilson notes that you’ll need to take steps to prove that a thief, not you, is using your identity.
12. Most people don’t understand the terms Deep Web and Dark Web. How do you explain these to the average person?
Wilson explains that the Deep Web refers to websites that aren’t indexed by search engines like Google, so you need to know the exact address of a Deep Web site to visit it.
The Dark Web sits within the Deep Web, says Wilson. The Dark Web is several marketplaces that sell goods and services such as narcotics, stolen identities, and guns. Their addresses usually end in .onion (rather than .com, .org, etc.).
Deep Web: Websites and webpages that aren’t indexed by search engines, so you can’t get to them through Google or other search engines. You can get to them using a normal browser, as long as you know the website address or click a link to it. There are good and bad, legal and illegal sites in the Deep Web.
Dark Web (or Dark Net or Darknet): Websites that aren’t indexed by search engines, so you can’t get to them through Google or other search engines. They can’t be visited using a normal browser, and typically require a Tor browser to visit, and that you know the website address or click a link to it. The Dark Web is home to an underground trade in illegal goods and services (though not all Dark Web content is illegal).
13. How well is the US government handling current cyber threats? How well do you think it’s prepared to handle future cyber threats?
I think they’re handling cyber issues very well. It’s always a game of cat-and-mouse. You catch up to one issue, one problem, and then another one happens. And the criminals always have a leg up, because they’ll go where we won’t. … There’s laws, rules, and regulations that we [the government] have to abide by in order to catch these guys. … it takes us a little while to get through those, but then we eventually get through them and we start catching the guys. Then they change their MO [mode of operation] again and we have to go through that whole cycle before we catch them again.
There are think tanks and groups that focus on potential future threats, says Wilson. Some threats cross lines between several government agencies and commercial organizations, says Wilson. He points out that the challenge is to figure out how the federal government can help an institution defend itself against a nation-state attack, and how the government will respond to such a situation.
14. Several governments have pushed back against end-to-end encryption, or requested backdoor access so they can monitor encrypted communication. What’s your opinion?
We’re always battling privacy and security, and that’s the main debate here.
Wilson advocates caution. “Would I want anyone to have full access to all my data and everything? No, I wouldn’t,” he says. But he points out that if there was another national crisis such as the September 11 attacks, he would want the government to have backdoor access to the phone of a suspect.
There’s a fine balance there, and I can see both sides of “hey, we need access to this as the government” but then also “as a private citizen, my information is private.”
Although Wilson doesn’t worry about the government monitoring him because he says he’s not doing anything wrong, he recognizes that other governments intrude into the private lives of their citizens.
Wilson thinks there should be some way for the government to get access to private communications when necessary. “I don’t think total anonymity is the key for everyone,” he says.
15. You’ve witnessed digital security and privacy trends over the last couple of decades. Are you optimistic or pessimistic about the future?
“I think I’m pretty optimistic,” Wilson says. He points out that as new technology pops up, we need to figure out the privacy concerns involved.
16. The 4iQ website shares news and advice about data breaches and identity theft. How else do you recommend people stay informed of cybersecurity and privacy issues?
Wilson does a lot of reading about data breaches, including websites such as Data Breach Today. For consumers, he recommends an identity theft monitoring service that watches for your specific data, and notifies you of breaches.
17. Do you have any other warnings, advice, or encouragement you’d like to share before we conclude?
It’s the holidays, so this is where things gear up. … be very careful about where you spend your money … also … giving [your] information out. If it doesn’t seem right, then don’t do it. … Be very vigilant during the holidays about what kind of information, and what kind of digital footprint you’re leaving out there.