Without going too far out on a limb, I believe almost everyone would like two things from their jobs and careers: success and happiness. They want to do relatively well financially, receive fair recognition for their accomplishments, enjoy their work as much as one can, and become happier as a person as a result.
These are reasonable goals, but they can be a lot to ask—so many people, especially ambitious, hard-working people, simplify them in a logical way: They first seek success and then assume that success will lead to happiness. But this reasoning is flawed. Chasing success has costs that can end up lowering happiness, as many a desiccated, lonely workaholic can tell you.
This is not to say that you have to choose between success and happiness. You can obtain both. But you have to reverse the order of operations: Instead of trying first to get success and hoping it leads to happiness, start by working on your happiness, which will enhance your success.
Success and happiness are generally positively correlated, as many workforce studies have shown. For example, companies in Fortune magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” list saw an average 14 percent stock-price increase every year from 1998 to 2005, compared with 6 percent for the overall market.
And as Gallup data have shown, among business units with employee-engagement levels (that is, employees who reported feeling heard, respected, and intellectually stimulated, and who had a best friend at work) in the 99th percentile, 73 percent perform above the company average, and 78 percent perform above the industry average.
From this correlation, many assume causation—from success to happiness. During my years as an executive, I found that people strongly believe that pay increases—especially big ones—will have a large and long-lasting effect on their job satisfaction. The data tell us a different story, however: Large wage increases have only a small and transitory effect on well-being.
Researchers in 2017 tracked the pay and job satisfaction (measured on a 0–10 scale) of nearly 35,000 German workers over several years. The study found that the anticipation of a 100 percent pay bump increases job satisfaction by about a quarter of one digit in the year before the raise. The raise increases that satisfaction bump by another fifth of a digit. By the fourth year, the increase has fallen to less than a fifth in total.
In other words, say your job satisfaction is a six out of 10—not bad, but could be better. If your boss doubles your pay, it will get you to about 6.5, and then it will fall back to about 6.2. Maybe this isn’t the best strategy to help you love your job. And that doesn’t even take into account the cost that increased job success can have on overall life satisfaction. In 2016, psychologists measured career success by asking 990 college-educated full-time professionals to compare their career achievements to others’.
They found that people generally enjoyed the money and status that relative success produced. However, success did not lead to total contentment: It indirectly chipped away at life satisfaction, likely via time constraints, stress, and impoverished social relationships.
Much stronger and more positive results emerge, however, when researchers reverse the order, looking not at success’s effects on happiness, but happiness’s effect on success. Scholars in 2005 surveyed hundreds of studies—including experiments to establish causality—and concluded that happiness leads to success in many realms of life, including marriage, friendship, health, income, and work performance.
One explanation might be that happiness makes us more attractive, so we are rewarded by others. Alternatively, happiness might make us more productive. Novel experimental research suggests both are true. For example, scholars in 2021 studied Chinese livestream web broadcasters, for whom voluntary viewer tips are the primary source of income.
They found that when they showed more positive emotion, their tips immediately increased, suggesting that people who appear happy are rewarded in the market. Another experiment involved British test subjects engaging in a time-limited arithmetic task and math test. The researchers found that subjects who were shown a clip of a comedy movie beforehand were about 12 percent more productive on the task and test than those who weren’t, and that the funnier they found the clip, the more productive they were.
Whether you are an employee or employer, it is a better investment to increase happiness at work and in life, rather than simply trying to increase measures of success.
The first thing to remember is that happiness requires balance. No matter how much you enjoy your work, overwork will become an obstruction to well-being. Researchers in 2020 studying 414 Iranian bank employees found that workaholic behavior (such as perfectionism and work addiction) strongly predicted workplace incivility (such as hostility, privacy invasion, exclusionary behavior, and gossiping).
Workaholic behaviors also degraded the quality of family life (as measured in disagreement with statements such as “My involvement in work provides me with a sense of success; this, in turn, helps me to be a better person in my family”).
You should guard against workaholism in yourself and help your friends and family who suffer from it. But just as important, employers should not encourage overwork—which will likely require effort and attention on their part, as research shows that executives generally underestimate employees’ struggles with well-being.
Once work quantity is under control, happiness at work requires a sense of meaning and purpose. I have written in this column that the two key aspects of meaningful work are earned success and service to others. Earned success implies a sense of accomplishment and recognition for a job well done, while service to others requires knowledge of the real people who benefit from your work.
Lots of research shows the importance of these work aspects. For example, Gallup has revealed that people who serve their communities and receive recognition for it self-report significantly less stress and worry in their lives than those who do not (either because they don’t serve their communities or do not receive recognition).
Meanwhile, the most meaningful jobs tend to be those that are the most service-oriented. According to 2016 research by the Pew Research Center, proportionally, more workers in nonprofit and government sectors—i.e., work that is generally service-oriented—said their jobs give them a sense of identity than did private-sector workers.
It’s harder to find the link to service in some professions than others, but it can usually be done. Years ago, I was working with a team of academic researchers creating policies for improved bank regulation. One scholar who was particularly passionate about the project told me he always remembered that his work mattered, because poor people need access to reasonably priced credit, and that requires less bureaucratic red tape.
Even if you struggle to see who benefits, because the people you touch with your work are very far away or your work touches them indirectly, try looking a little closer—maybe even in the next cubicle. You can always enjoy the effects of service by helping your colleagues, and there is clear evidence that supporting co-workers can help ease negative emotions at work.
Ultimately, although success and happiness are linked, the alchemy is mostly one-way—and not in the way that most people think. Working on your success to get happier is inefficient at best, and may blow up in your face and lead you to unhappiness. But working on your happiness gives you the best chance at getting both.
Even if all of this makes sense to you, you may still find yourself falling into old habits of seeking happiness via worldly success at work. Don’t feel too bad—I do it too, even as a specialist in this field. Whenever I notice my hours creeping up to workaholic levels and my dreams of happiness revolving around some accomplishment, I like to reread a short story published in 1922 by Franz Kafka called “A Hunger Artist.”
It features a man who starves himself in a cage for a living as a traveling carnival act. He is obsessed with his work and, as a perfectionist, seeks what he calls “flawless fasting.” The hunger artist is proud of his success, although he is always gloomy, and, Kafka writes, “if a good-natured man who felt sorry for him ever wanted to explain to him that his sadness probably came from his fasting … the hunger artist responded with an outburst of rage.”
Over time, the hunger artist’s act falls out of public favor. In desperation to resuscitate his flagging career, he tries fasting longer than he ever has before. Instead, he is utterly ignored, and sits alone in his cage. In the end, the hunger artist starves himself to death. In a twist of absurdism—
we might even call it Kafkaesque—the protagonist admits just before expiring that the only reason he had engaged in his art was because he could not find any food to his liking. I’m not that bad, of course, but I have a bit of a hunger artist in me, and you might too. Here’s my advice: You won’t find happiness by forgoing happiness. Don’t starve yourself. Your odds of success will increase if you eat.
“happiness”. Wolfram Alpha. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 24 February 2011.Anand, P (2016). Happiness Explained: What Human Flourishing is and What We Can Do to Promote It. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198735458.[page needed]
“Happiness”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2020.Feldman, Fred (2010). What is This Thing Called Happiness?. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571178.001.0001. ISBN 978-0199571178.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states that “An important project in the philosophy of happiness is simply getting clear on what various writers are talking about.” https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ Archived 11 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine
“Two Philosophical Problems in the Study of Happiness”. Archived from the original on 14 October 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2018.Smith, Richard (August 2008). “The Long Slide to Happiness”. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 42 (3–4): 559–573. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00650.x.
“How Universal is Happiness?” Ruut Veenhoven, Chapter 11 in Ed Diener, John F. Helliwell & Daniel Kahneman (Eds.) International Differences in Well-Being, 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, ISBN 978-0199732739Veenhoven, R. “Does Happiness Differ Across Cultures?” (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 10 October 2018.
Wolff-Mann, Ethan (13 October 2015). “What the New Nobel Prize Winner Has to Say About Money and Happiness”. Money.com. Archived from the original on 29 April 2022. Retrieved 9 October 2018.Dan Haybron (https://www.slu.edu/colleges/AS/philos/site/people/faculty/Haybron/ Archived 30 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine,
http://www.happinessandwellbeing.org/project-team/ Archived 12 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine); “I would suggest that when we talk about happiness, we are actually referring, much of the time, to a complex emotional phenomenon. Call it emotional well-being. Happiness as emotional well-being concerns your emotions and moods, more broadly your emotional condition as a whole.
https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/04/13/happiness-and-its-discontents/ Archived 12 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine Haybron has also used the term thymic, by which he means ‘overall mood state’ in this context; https://philpapers.org/rec/HAYHAE Archived 18 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine Xavier Landes <https://www.sseriga.edu/landes-xavier> Archived 30 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine> has described a similar concept of mood. https://www.satori.lv/article/kas-ir-laime Archived 13 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine
“People don’t want to be happy the way I’ve defined the term – what I experience here and now. “https://www.haaretz.com/premium.MAGAZINE-why-nobel-prize-winner-daniel-kahneman-gave-up-on-happiness-1.6528513 Archived 8 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine“Happy | Definition of happy in English by Oxford Dictionaries”. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2018.
“HAPPINESS | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary”. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2018.“The definition of happy”. Archived from the original on 9 October 2018. Retrieved 9 October 2018.Graham, Michael C. (2014). Facts of Life: ten issues of contentment. Outskirts Press. pp. 6–10. ISBN 978-1478722595.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/ Archived 11 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine 2011, “‘Happiness’ is often used, in ordinary life, to refer to a short-lived state of a person, frequently a feeling of contentment: ‘You look happy today’; ‘I’m very happy for you’. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/well-being/ Archived 25 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine 2017
“People don’t want to be happy the way I’ve defined the term – what I experience here and now. In my view, it’s much more important for them to be satisfied, to experience life satisfaction, from the perspective of ‘What I remember,’ of the story they tell about their lives.”https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium.MAGAZINE-why-nobel-prize-winner-daniel-kahneman-gave-up-on-happiness-1.6528513 Archived 2018-10-08 at the Wayback Machine
Mandel, Amir (7 October 2018). “Why Nobel Prize Winner Daniel Kahneman Gave Up on Happiness”. Haaretz.Livni, Ephrat (21 December 2018). “A Nobel Prize-winning psychologist says most people don’t really want to be happy”. Quartz.e.g. ‘Can Happiness be Measured’, Action for Happiness, http://www.actionforhappiness.org/why-happiness Archived 18 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine
The How of Happiness, Lyubomirsky, 2007Kashdan, Todd B.; Biswas-Diener, Robert; King, Laura A. (October 2008). “Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia”. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 3 (4): 219–233. doi:10.1080/17439760802303044. S2CID 17056199.“Landes Xavier | Stockholm School of Economics in Riga”. Archived from the original on 30 August 2019. Retrieved 30 August 2019.
https://www.satori.lv/article/kas-ir-laime Archived 13 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine Contact the author for English versionJoshanloo, Mohsen (18 October 2019). “Lay Conceptions of Happiness: Associations With Reported Well-Being, Personality Traits, and Materialism”. Frontiers in Psychology. 10: 2377. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02377. PMC 6813919. PMID 31681129.
“I am happy when I’m unhappy.” Mark Baum character, The Big Short (film), https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/The_Big_Short_(film)#Mark_Baum Archived 17 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine
If the results hold up, the upshot appears to be that income is pretty strongly related to life satisfaction, but weakly related to emotional well-being, at least above a certain threshold.” Section 3.3, Happiness, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/happiness/#HedVerEmoSta Archived 2018-06-11 at the Wayback Machine
“High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being”, Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 21/9/10Inc, Gallup (24 April 2015). “Who Are the Happiest People in the World? The Swiss or Latin Americans?”. Gallup.com.Helliwell, John; Yang, Shun (2012).
World Happiness Report 2012 (Report). p. 11. Archived from the original on 18 July 2016.
How does happiness come into this classification? For better or worse, it enters in three ways. It is sometimes used as a current emotional report – “How happy are you now?,” sometimes as a remembered emotion, as in “How happy were you yesterday?,”Chernoff, Naina N. (6 May 2002). “Memory Vs. Experience: Happiness is Relative”. Observer. Association for Psychological Science. Retrieved 10 November 2021.
Inge, W.R. (1926). Lay Thoughts of a Dean. Creative Media Partners, LLC. ISBN 978-1379053095.
Looking back, I think I can separate the years when I was happy and those when I was unhappy. But perhaps at the time I should have judged differently.Helliwell, John; et al. World Happiness Report 2015 (Report).
Some have argued that it is misleading to use ‘happiness’ as a generic term to cover subjective well-being more generally.
Tokumitsu, Miya (June 2017). “Did the Fun Work?”. The Baffler. 35. Archived from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 3 February 2019.Kahneman, Daniel; Riis, Jason (2005). “Living, and thinking about it: two perspectives on life” (PDF). In Huppert, Felicia A; Baylis, Nick; Keverne, Barry (eds.). The science of well-being. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567523.003.0011. ISBN 978-0198567523. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
Lyubomirsky, Sonja; Lepper, Heidi S. (February 1999). “A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation”. Social Indicators Research. 46 (2): 137–155. doi:10.1023/A:1006824100041. JSTOR 27522363. S2CID 28334702.Watson, David; Clark, Lee A.; Tellegen, Auke (1988). “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54 (6): 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.523. PMID 3397865.
Watson, David; Clark, Lee Anna (1994), The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule – Expanded Form, The University of Iowa, doi:10.17077/48vt-m4t2“SWLS Rating Form”. tbims.org. Archived from the original on 16 April 2012. Retrieved 1 April 2012.Diener, Ed; Emmons, Robert A.; Larsen, Randy J.; Griffin, Sharon (1985). “The Satisfaction With Life Scale”. Journal of Personality Assessment. 49 (1): 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13. PMID 16367493. S2CID 27546553.
Levin, K. A.; Currie, C. (November 2014). “Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Version of the Cantril Ladder for Use with Adolescent Samples”. Social Indicators Research. 119 (2): 1047–1063. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0507-4. S2CID 144584204.“FAQ”. Archived from the original on 31 December 2018. Retrieved 27 January 2019.Inc, Gallup. “Gallup 2019 Global Emotions Report”. Gallup.com.
Galkin, Fedor; Kochetov, Kirill; Keller, Michelle; Zhavoronkov, Alex; Etcoff, Nancy (20 June 2022). “Optimizing future well-being with artificial intelligence: self-organizing maps (SOMs) for the identification of islands of emotional stability”. Aging. 14 (12): 4935–4958. doi:10.18632/aging.204061. ISSN 1945-4589. PMC 9271294. PMID 35723468. S2CID 249869231.
Helliwell, John; Layard, Richard; Sachs, Jeffrey, eds. (2012). World Happiness Report. ISBN 978-0996851305. Archived from the original on 18 July 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2016.[page needed]“Measuring National Well-being: Life in the UK, 2012”. Ons.gov.uk. 20 November 2012. Archived from the original on 26 March 2013. Retrieved 26 April 2013.
“The Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan” (PDF). National Council. Royal Government of Bhutan. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2017.Kelly, Annie (1 December 2012). “Gross national happiness in Bhutan: the big idea from a tiny state that could change the world”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 April 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
Anand, Paul; Krishnakumar, Jaya; Tran, Ngoc Bich (April 2011). “Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity”. Journal of Public Economics. 95 (3–4): 205–215. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.007. S2CID 53679226. Baumeister, Roy F.; Vohs, Kathleen D.; Aaker, Jennifer L.; Garbinsky, Emily N. (November 2013). “Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life”.
The Journal of Positive Psychology. 8 (6): 505–516. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.830764. S2CID 11271686.Costa, Paul T.; McCrae, Robert R.; Zonderman, Alan B. (August 1987). “Environmental and dispositional influences on well-being: Longitudinal follow-up of an American national sample”. British Journal of Psychology. 78 (3): 299–306. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02248.x. PMID 3620790.Annas, Julia (1995). Morality of happiness. Library Genesis. Oxford : Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195096521.
Hare, John (2006). “Religion and Morality”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.MacIntyre, Alasdair (1998). A Short History of Ethics (Second ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. p. 167. ISBN 978-0415173988.Phillips, Jonathan; Misenheimer, Luke; Knobe, Joshua (July 2011). “The Ordinary Concept of Happiness (and Others Like It)”. Emotion Review. 3 (3): 320–322. doi:10.1177/1754073911402385. S2CID 19273270.
Aknin, Lara B.; Whillans, Ashley V. (January 2021). “Helping and Happiness: A Review and Guide for Public Policy”. Social Issues and Policy Review. 15 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1111/sipr.12069. S2CID 225505120.Hui, Bryant P. H.; Ng, Jacky C. K.; Berzaghi, Erica; Cunningham-Amos, Lauren A.; Kogan, Aleksandr (December 2020). “Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being”. Psychological Bulletin. 146 (12): 1084–1116. doi:10.1037/bul0000298. PMID 32881540. S2CID 221497259
Mill, John Stuart (1879). Utilitarianism. Longmans, Green, and Co.Robinson, Daniel N. (1999). Aristotle’s psychology. Joe Christensen Inc. ISBN 978-0967206608. OCLC 48601517.Bartlett, R. C., & Collins, S. D. (2011). Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226026749[page needed]Reece, Bryan (2019). “Happiness According to Aristotle”. Research Bulletin.
“Aristotle And His Definition Of Happiness – Overview”. http://www.pursuit-of-happiness.org. Retrieved 18 March 2021.“Revisiting Aristotle: In Pursuit of Happiness”. Negotiating the Good Life. 2017. pp. 15–46. doi:10.4324/9781315248233-2. ISBN 978-1315248233.Dopico, Alex (9 October 2018). “What is the purpose of happiness in human existence?”. JANETPANIC.COM.Nietzsche, Friedrich (1889). Twilight of the Idols. OUP Oxford. p. 1. ISBN 978-0140445145.
“Nietzsche’s Moral and Political Philosophy”. stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 10 August 2015.“Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900)”. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 15 August 2015. Retrieved 10 August 2015.McMahon, Darrin M. (April 2004). “From the happiness of virtue to the virtue of happiness: 400 B.C. – A.D. 1780”. Daedalus. 133 (2): 5–17. doi:10.1162/001152604323049343. S2CID 57569719.
Cosmides, Leda; Tooby, John (2000). “Evolutionary Psychology and the Emotions”. In Lewis, Michael; Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M. (eds.). Handbook of emotions (2 ed.). New York: Guilford Press. ISBN 978-1572305298. Retrieved 2 April 2017.Lewis, Michael (12 July 2016). “Self-Conscious emotions”. In Barrett, Lisa Feldman; Lewis, Michael; Haviland-Jones, Jeannette M. (eds.). Handbook of Emotions (Fourth ed.). Guilford Publications. p. 793. ISBN 978-1462525362. Retrieved 1 April 2017.
Marketing Programs To Buy: