Even the most seasoned and well-adjusted remote workers know the risk: If you’re not careful, working from home can bring your physical activity to a standstill.
Employers know this too. Increasingly, they are looking for ways to bolster their wellness programs by offering fitness trackers, such as those made by Fitbit, Garmin, and Amazon, to help employees log more movement during the day. Another popular option called Oura makes smart rings that can track sleep, fitness, temperature, and even signs of illness. An Oura dashboard even lets employers view the likelihood of illness across their entire workforce.
Employees who log a certain amount of physical activity can then receive insurance discounts through many major health insurance companies, such as UnitedHealth Group, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, and Aetna. Beneficiaries can get reimbursed for prescription co-pays and other health care costs under their deductibles.
But fitness trackers in the workplace, and health surveillance in general, also carry considerable privacy risks. More than 60 million records from Fitbit, Apple, and other companies were compromised in June after a data breach on GetHealth, a third-party group that provides employee fitness incentives.
Data breaches of fitness trackers like Strava have revealed personal details such as the name and location of participants, even in anonymized data. Security risks aside, you may not even want to have so many personal details about your employees at your fingertips. After all, constant surveillance won’t exactly put your team at ease.
Before offering fitness trackers to your employees, here are a few things you should keep in mind:
1. Fitness trackers will save you money on premiums, for now.
Workplace fitness-tracker programs often offer discounts on insurance premiums if employees meet certain fitness goals. Some employees can earn as much as $1,500 a year they can apply toward their health insurance premiums. Workers can get free or discounted wearables, workout clothing, and even gym equipment. On the employer side, a few studies have shown that fitness trackers can help you save money on premiums. But some companies have reported that their insurance costs have remained the same.
At present, there are no laws or regulations in place to stop insurers from using fitness-tracker data to raise premiums. In an article published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers from the AMA raised concerns that such data could increase insurance premiums for some groups.
“Wearables can collect information on physical activity, calorie intake, blood pressure, and weight. Insurance companies are now using this data for rewards programs, but there are no regulations stopping them from doing the opposite,” wrote the authors.
2. The data your employees share isn’t protected by HIPAA.
Health care providers and health insurers are barred from sharing any patient information by HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. But that ban doesn’t extend to Google, Apple, or any private companies through which employees elect to share their health care data. As The Wall Street Journal reports, there’s nothing under HIPAA that would bar third-party companies from analyzing or selling the health care data users voluntarily give up.
If you’re looking to adopt fitness-tracker programs, read up on the device-maker’s privacy policies and be prepared to answer questions from employees. You will have the added responsibility of explaining to workers how much access your own company has to their data, and how it’s being used. Workers need to understand that you will not be using data from the fitness trackers against them, and are under no obligation to sign up for the program.
3. The research on fitness-tracker effectiveness is mixed.
For some people, wearing a device that tracks their activity levels is enough of a reason to get off the sofa. But changing health habits permanently requires a lot more effort. One study published in The Lancet from researchers at the Duke-NUS Medical School found that wearing an activity tracker, along with a cash incentive, improved the fitness levels of employees.
But after the cash incentive was discontinued after six months, employees didn’t maintain their previous fitness levels. The study also compared employees who wore fitness trackers with those who did not, and found no real difference in the amount of activity performed.
But a number of other studies indicate that fitness trackers do help increase activity levels, either by small or moderate amounts. In one analysis of 28 studies with more than 7,000 participants published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, researchers found that those with fitness trackers were more physically active than those in groups without. Added features like setting personal goals and text reminders were the most effective in getting people to exercise.
If your company chooses to enroll in a fitness-tracker program, keep in mind that you’re unlikely to entice all of your employees to adopt it. If you want to help improve the health of workers, you can also try methods like subsidized gym memberships, healthy food choices at work, or reimbursement for fitness equipment. While fitness trackers can certainly play a role in improving health outcomes, they are just one tool. Substantive lifestyle changes, including good nutrition, sleep, and fitness, also are required.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that the fitness tracker Strava had a data breach that revealed personal details such as the name and location of participants, including in anonymized data. According to Strava spokesman, the company has never had a data breach.
- Menaspà P. Effortless activity tracking with Google Fit. Br J Sports Med. 2015
- Jakicic, JM; Davis, KK; Rogers, RJ; King, WC; Marcus, MD; Helsel, D; Rickman, AD; Wahed, AS; Belle, SH (20 September 2016). “Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial”. JAMA. 316 (11): 1161–1171. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12858. PMC 5480209. PMID 27654602.
- Examination of Wearable and Non-Wearable Consumer Sleep-Tracking Devices Versus Polysomnography (Sleep (journal), Volume 42, Issue Supplement 1, April 2019.
- “Governor Rell’s Committee on Physical Fitness calls on residents to join President’s Challenge to get more active”, Press release, Stamford Plus, April 2, 2008.
- “Olympic Medical Institute Validates Polar RS800 Running Computer And Training System”, Polar, November 7, 2006, retrieved February 25, 2014, archived February 25, 2014.
- Jeff Beckham, “Fitness Trackers Use Psychology to Motivate Couch Potatoes”, Wired, April 19, 2012.
- Jill Duffy, “The Best Activity Trackers for Fitness”, PC Magazine, May 22, 2013.
- Caroline McCarthy, “Work out, get on scale…tell your friends?”, CNET, July 21, 2010.
- Rheana Murray, “Smartphones become fitness coaches with new wearable activity trackers”, New York Daily News, August 16, 2013.
- Dan Holden, “Worn Out: The Dark Side of Wearable Technology”, Metro Silicon Valley, September 24, 2014, pp. 16–18.
- Danny Sullivan, “The test begins: My life with four activity trackers, fitness bands”, CNET, March 28, 2013.
- “CES: Track your activity level, get cheaper health insurance?”, Stream, Consumer Electronics Show, MarketWatch, The Wall Street Journal, January 10, 2013.
- “Tracker shares your habits with work”, Technology, BBC News, January 7, 2015 (video).
- David Z. Morris, “Forget the iWatch. Headphones are the original wearable tech”, Fortune, June 24, 2014.
- Nathan Ingraham, “Motiv Crammed a Full Fitness Tracker into a Ring”, “Engadget“, Jan 3, 2017
- “Whistle wearable technology for dogs lets owners monitor pet activity”, De Zeen, May 14, 2014.
- Jill Duffy, “Whistle Dog Activity Tracker Adds GPS Location Finder”, PC Magazine, May 21, 2014.
- Heather Zimmerman, “Digital Dog”, Metro Silicon Valley, September 24, 2014, p. 17.
- G. F., “Quantified self: Fit, fit, hooray!”, Babbage, The Economist, May 24, 2013.
- Chuong Nguyen, “Zamzee Activity Tracker Hopes to Combat Obesity in Children”, Ubergizmo, November 23, 2010.
- Sherry Turkle, “Always On/Always-On-You: The Tethered Self”, in: Handbook of Mobile And Communication Studies, ed. James Everett Katz, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT, 2008, ISBN 9780262276818, pp. 121–37.
- Fredrik Ohlin and Carl Magnus Olsson, “Intelligent Computing in Personal Informatics: Key Design Considerations”, In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 263–274, accessed June 23, 2015.
- Mónica Guzmán, “Using tech to change your habits? Lessons from a behavior change fanatic” Archived 2013-12-14 at the Wayback Machine, Seattle Times blogs, January 28, 2013.
- Fors, Vaike; Pink, Sarah; Berg, Martin; O’Dell, Tom (2020). Imagining Personal Data. Bloomsbury Academic. doi:10.5040/9781350051416. ISBN 978-1-350-05138-6.
- Allen, Anita L. (2008). “Dredging up the Past: Lifelogging, Memory, and Surveillance” (PDF). The University of Chicago Law Review. 75: 47–74. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-13. Retrieved 2013-12-08.
- Jack Loftus, “Dear Fitbit Users, Kudos On the 30 Minutes of ‘Vigorous Sexual Activity’ Last Night”, Gizmodo, July 3, 2011. The company has changed privacy settings to avoid this: “Updates to your profile page” Archived 2011-07-09 at the Wayback Machine, Fitbit blog, July 4, 2011.
- “Best Kids’ Fitness Trackers of 2017 – UNICEF Kid Power”. UNICEF Kid Power. Archived from the original on 22 February 2017. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
- Singh, Nikhil; Moneghetti, Kegan James; Christle, Jeffrey Wilcox; Hadley, David; Plews, Daniel; Froelicher, Victor (August 2018). “Heart Rate Variability: An Old Metric with New Meaning in the Era of using mHealth Technologies for Health and Exercise Training Guidance. Part One: Physiology and Methods”. Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review. 7 (3): 193–198. doi:10.15420/aer.2018.27.2. ISSN 2050-3369. PMC 6141929. PMID 30416733.
- Ermes, Miikka (January 2008). “Detection of Daily Activities and Sports With Wearable Sensors in Controlled and Uncontrolled Conditions”. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 12 (1): 20–26. doi:10.1109/TITB.2007.899496. PMID 18270033. S2CID 18080013.
- Fitnessarmbaender – Nur zwei von zwoelf sind gut, test.de, December 27, 2015. Retrieved on January 6, 2016
- Sly, Liz (29 January 2018). “U.S. soldiers are revealing sensitive and dangerous information by jogging”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 29 January 2018.
- Wiesner, Martin; Zowalla, Richard; Suleder, Julian; Westers, Maximilian; Pobiruchin, Monika (2018). “Technology Adoption, Motivational Aspects, and Privacy Concerns of Wearables in the German Running Community: Field Study”. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 6 (12): e201. doi:10.2196/mhealth.9623. PMC 6315235. PMID 30552085.
- Plante, Timothy B.; Martin, Seth S. (17 January 2017). “Wearable Technology and Long-term Weight Loss”. JAMA. 317 (3): 318–319. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19265. PMID 28114543.
- Klasnja, Predrag; Hekler, Eric B. (17 January 2017). “Wearable Technology and Long-term Weight Loss”. JAMA. 317 (3): 317–318. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19268. PMID 28114544.
- Jo, A; Coronel, BD; Coakes, CE; Mainous AG, 3rd (11 July 2019). “Is There a Benefit to Patients Using Wearable Devices Such as Fitbit or Health Apps on Mobiles? A Systematic Review”. The American Journal of Medicine. 132 (12): 1394–1400.e1. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.06.018. PMID 31302077.
- Laranjo, Liliana; Ding, Ding; Heleno, Bruno; Kocaballi, Baki; Quiroz, Juan C.; Tong, Huong Ly; Chahwan, Bahia; Neves, Ana Luisa; Gabarron, Elia; Dao, Kim Phuong; Rodrigues, David; Neves, Gisela Costa; Antunes, Maria L.; Coiera, Enrico; Bates, David W. (8 December 2020). “Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression”. British Journal of Sports Medicine: bjsports-2020-102892. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892. hdl:10400.21/12519. PMID 33355160.
- Peyer, Karissa L.; Ellingson, Laura D.; Bus, Kathryn; Walsh, Sarah A.; Franke, Warren D.; Welk, Gregory J. (June 2017). “Comparative effectiveness of guided weight loss and physical activity monitoring for weight loss and metabolic risks: A pilot study”. Preventive Medicine Reports. 6: 271–277. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.002. PMC 5385579. PMID 28409089.
- Ridgers, ND; McNarry, MA; Mackintosh, KA (November 23, 2016). “Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review”. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 4 (4): e129. doi:10.2196/mhealth.6540. PMC 5143467. PMID 27881359.
Böhm, B; Karwiese, SD; Böhm, H; Oberhoffer, R (30 April 2019). “Effects of Mobile Health Including Wearable Activity Trackers to Increase Physical Activity Outcomes Among Healthy Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review”. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 7 (4): e8298. doi:10.2196/mhealth.8298. PMC 6658241. PMID 31038460.