3 Ineffective Discipline Habits That Make Your Kid Anxious

When kids get anxious, they become avoidant instead of learning how to handle situations better in the future.

Discipline is tough. With the number of times kids need correction every day, it’s understandable that parents develop habits that aren’t always thought through. In a flood of snap judgments, chaos management and a desire to regain control of a difficult situation, ineffective and problematic discipline techniques come up. Not only don’t they work, they can make kids confused and anxious. Nobody wins.

“As parents, we have to ask ourselves questions about what outcomes we want when we discipline our kids,” says anxiety therapist Chad Brandt, PhD. “The best scenario is that they come to understand why what they did was wrong so they can learn and practice alternatives.”

Brandt sees several common discipline mistakes from parents, but luckily he has simple tools for reflection and change to help parents get their kids mentally and emotionally engaged. Then, rather than kids walking on eggshells while focusing on not getting caught, they can maximize their growth potential from challenging situations.

Discipline Mistake #1: Physical Discipline

Research continues to demonstrate that spanking and other forms of physical discipline are unhealthy for kids. There’s evidence that physical discipline may change the structure of a child’s brain and that spanking isn’t an effective method for positive behavior change.

Physical discipline can also contribute to a cycle of misbehavior by modeling actions that are likely to land kids in additional trouble if they emulate them. “You’re solving one discipline problem with a solution that you would tell them not to use in any other instance,” Brandt says. In other words, you don’t want your kid to hit their peers when they do something wrong.

And although kids aren’t likely to find any type of discipline fun or pleasant, the anxiety that physical discipline elicits can exacerbate behavioral issues by driving kids to be even more secretive. “When kids experience the physical reaction to pain, they’ll start to hide their behavior from you.

Or they’ll lie or cover things up because they don’t want a spanking,” he says. “You’re not teaching them how to change the behavior. Instead, you’re teaching them how to avoid you.”

Successful discipline teaches kids how to understand why what they did was wrong and appropriate responses for the next time they’re in a similar situation. An engaged child will grow in self-awareness and emotional attunement. But an anxious child will become avoidant.

Want to really help your child engage during the discipline process? Brandt suggests parents show their kids empathy. Walk them through ways they can more appropriately handle similar situations in the future to add layers of positive reinforcement.

“If your child lashes out at a sibling for taking their toy, you can ask what emotion they felt when that happened,” Brandt says. “Then let them know that the next time they feel that emotion, they can either politely ask for the toy back or come get you for help. Then you and your child can practice one or both of those solutions together.”

Discipline Mistake #2: Overly Harsh Discipline

Even parents who don’t ascribe to physical discipline can be overly harsh with their children. When a kid gets put in time-out, for example, it can be tempting to keep them there just a little too long, for any number of reasons. But if the timeout stretches too long, it can become counterproductive.

“Usually, we would say about a minute per year or life with a max of like 10 minutes before it stops being a useful tool,” Brandt says. “There’s a limit to how long kids can process information. And for younger kids, that limit is pretty short. So they might have a timeout and learn for a minute, and then play in their room or sit on the chair and daydream. And that’s something that you don’t want. That defeats the purpose.”

It may be helpful to combine a brief timeout with another appropriate disciplinary action to help kids process their misbehavior. But again, the emphasis is on suitable. Being too extreme pushes the experience past being a learning opportunity and makes it anxiety-producing. Your child ate candy without asking? They don’t get dessert that night. But don’t take away dessert for the whole week.

Discipline Mistake #3: Inconsistent Discipline

“The most important aspect of discipline is being consistent with rules and consequences. In fact, consistency is going to be more important than the specific consequence, especially when kids are younger,” Brandt says.

When rules and expectations are constantly in flux, kids can get anxious even when they’re behaving appropriately. “Parents will put off disciplining their child because of how the child might respond. So the child has free rein to do whatever, until the parent snaps and gets angry,” Brandt says. “For the child, it’s confusing when they get to do whatever they want, until all of the sudden they get yelled at.”

That combination of confusion and fear is a breeding ground for anxiety. In contrast, clarity, closure, and positivity create an environment where kids can learn it’s safe to acknowledge their mistakes and grow from them.

Brandt encourages families to end any disciplinary interaction with a note of optimism as a way for everyone to move on. “We don’t want to stay stuck in that difficult moment where the kid is angry because they feel misunderstood and like they’re labeled as a bad kid,” he says.

“So I’d just end the interaction with, ‘Now we understand what happened, and how we can keep it from happening again in the future. I can’t wait to see you handle that better the next time. You’ll do great.’”

And, hey, don’t be afraid to use some of that positivity and optimism on yourself. Habits can be hard to break. In chaotic parenting moments, it’s easy to slip back into anxiety-provoking discipline methods in an attempt to regain control of the situation. But reflecting on why you reverted to the undesired habit and what you can do differently in the future gives you a chance to handle the chaos better next time. You’ll do great.


Source: 3 Ineffective Discipline Habits That Make Your Kid Anxious – Fatherly | Fatherly


More contents:

How To Build A Highly Targeted Audience On Facebook Without Wasting Your Time

Everyone knows Social Media can be a cash cow, but why are most entrepreneurs business results dryer than the Sahara Desert? You can do what you’ve been doing and keep producing the same results or you can put your business on STEROIDS and have more customers to follow up with than you have time!

If time is your most valuable asset then leveraging social media is one of the most cost efficient and effective ways to build a business. Just be careful with how much time you spend on Social Media. It takes time, money or both to build a business.

So how does Simple Social Tools Really save time? Simple Social Tools Audience Toolkit was designed to model and automate normal social human activity, nothing more and nothing less. Unlike other tools that focus on unnatural behavior patterns that can easily be flagged or potentially harm your account.

Not only does Simple Social Tools save you time, but it also saves you energy and money. Think about this for just a moment…Do you really want to spend countless hours performing mundane task that are essential to build your audience, influence and engagement on Social Media or would you rather click a few buttons.

Social Media has changed the way Entrepreneurs do business and puts you in a position where there are no geographic limitations. You now have the opportunity to make a minimal investment into your business and scale your audience like never before instead of trying to figure out complicated and expensive ads.

If results are what you desire then understand your business is going to rise and fall based on the size and interest of your audience. Simple Social Tools has made it easy for both the newbie and the seasoned veteran to build, grow and scale audiences on both personal and professional profiles like never before.

It’s your time to FINALLY WIN on social media and dominate your social media presence with Simple Social Tools today.

Build A Laser Targeted & Responsive Audience

  • Quickly Add 5000 Friends
  • Only Takes A Few Minutes Of Your Time
  • Build Your Audience While You Sleep
  • A Targeted Audinece Is An Engaged Audience
  • Activity Drives Results And Produces Sales

Source: Audience Toolkit JV | Simple Social Tools

How To Talk to Someone Who Always Gets Defensive

Maybe you’re talking with your spouse. Or friend. Or brother. Or colleague. Whoever it is, you know that no matter how carefully you say something, the words won’t get through. They’re just so damn defensive.

You want to scream stuff like, “It’s not a personal attack” or “I’m just trying to have a conversation.” Mostly, you want to ask, “Can you just stop being so defensive?”

Here’s the thing: No, they probably can’t. It’s right there in the word. They’re defending. “It implies there’s a threat,” says Ellen Hendriksen, clinical psychologist and author of How to Be Yourself. It could be you, but just as likely your words are triggering something deep-seated.

Once their fears are ignited, all focus is danger related. It’s hard for the defensive person to get out of that mode. And saying something like, “Don’t get so defensive,” is about as effective as saying “Relax” to someone panicking.

So what can you do when talking to someone who always gets defensive? Turn up your empathy and turn down your assumptions, because you’re most likely going into the interaction hot. You’re bracing for that person to feel threatened and that ends up threatening you.

“Then we have two reptilian brains talking to each other,” says Laura Silberstein-Tirch, licensed psychologist and author of How to Be Nice to Yourself. That means both of you are down to three options: fight, flight or freeze. “It’s a limited repertoire.”

You want to open that up. You can open that up. It means going in with a different attitude, almost a blank slate, where what’s happened in the past doesn’t matter, and instead of continuing to pull on a rope, and trying to “win” the discussion, you drop it. As Silberstein-Tirch says.“Our hands are free, and we have the freedom to choose how to respond.”

How to Break Through Someone’s Defenses

There’s no one thing to say to talk to a defensive person, but it’s like any successful communication. Hendriksen says to stay in the first person – “you” ups the threat level – and focus on specific acts rather than making things eternal character traits. Example: “That presentation wasn’t at your usual level” is taken better than “You’re not really good at public speaking, are you?” You can also pepper in ways to make any criticism a show of confidence, with something like, “I’m saying this because I know you can handle it and because you’re really smart.”

“Turn it into faith in them,” Hendriken says.

But nothing is magic. Defensive people can turn the most benign comment into an attack, and there’s also something called sensitization. It’s like when hot coffee burns your tongue. Everything else, no matter how cool, will set it off, says Hendriksen. Your words, regardless of how thoughtful, can do that.

In those times, acknowledge the reality. It could be, “This might not be the right time. When would be better?” Or be even more direct with, “It seems what I’m saying isn’t working. How would you approach this problem?” In either of these scenarios, you’re out of the struggle, and giving responsibility to the other person to provide some insight and help with the solution.

“It allows them to show their cards a little more,” Silberstein-Tirch says.

Hitting Refresh

A common frustration in arguments is that the same issue comes up over and over, particularly with relatives and spouses. One approach is to have a meta-conversation, Silberstein-Tirch says. That is, talk about talking.

Consider saying, “I notice when we talk about your mother, things go off. What can we do about it?” Here, you’re not talking about the issue, but talking about talking about the issue, and that one step removed makes it easier for the other person to engage. Rather than bumping heads, you’re now teaming up on the problem, which in couples therapy is called unified detachment, Hendriksen says.

But what also helps is to come into the conversation clean, like it’s the first time. You stay away from lines like, “I know you’re gonna get defensive,” a preface that has never caused someone to exhale. Instead, you want what Silberstein-Tirch calls “beginner’s brain.”

It means being present for the conversation that’s about to happen. It’s impossible to do this every time, but if you can foresee a difficult interaction, deep breathing can help slow you down. So can noticing three things you see, hear, and feel, in that order. “It grounds you in the here and now,” she says.

It all sounds doable and probably helpful, but also like a bit much, especially for someone else’s triggers. Really, it’s not your problem.

Maybe so, and if you had to run through these options all the time with a person, it would be too much. But if it only happens occasionally with someone you care about or need to keep working with, then it might be more beneficial to swallow some ego and take into account what matters the most in the long-term.

“It’s the difference between being right or being effective,” Hendriksen says. “Do you choose being right or the relationship?”


Source: How to Talk to Someone Who Always Gets Defensive | Fatherly


More Contents:

Finding social roles in Wikipedia

HT Welser, D Cosley, G Kossinets, A Lin… – Proceedings of the …, 2011 – dl.acm.org
… Instead, we chose these roles because they are relevant to both the social interaction common
on Wikipedia, and they play important roles in the construction of the encyclopedia …

[PDF] On the Evolution of Wikipedia.

RB Almeida, B Mozafari, J Cho – ICWSM, 2007 – Citeseer
… presented will be use- ful both in the design of more effective social systems and … terests with
respect to the articles they contribute to, in a single interaction with Wikipedia, they tend …

Motivations of Wikipedia content contributors

HL Yang, CY Lai – Computers in human behavior, 2010 – Elsevier
… about posted topics. However, unlike other general virtual communities, social interaction
in Wikipedia is infrequent. Although some Wikipedia-related …

Building a signed network from interactions in Wikipedia

S Maniu, B Cautis, T Abdessalem – Databases and Social Networks, 2011 – dl.acm.org
… Our study sheds light into principles underlying a signed network that is cap- tured by social
interaction. We look into whether this network over Wikipedia contributors represents indeed …

Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: an insight from Wikipedia

NT Korfiatis, M Poulos, G Bokos – Online Information Review, 2006 – emerald.com
… the Wiki. Social interaction is approached from social communication facilitated by
the Wikipedia platform (eg edits on edits) (Cobley, 1996). We then …

Who did what: Editor role identification in Wikipedia

D Yang, A Halfaker, R Kraut, E Hovy – … Conference on Web and Social …, 2016 – ojs.aaai.org
… work, such as social interaction, community support, and maintain- ing standards in our role
models, we included the number of edits editors made in each Wikipedia namespace10 into …

Casting a web of trust over wikipedia: an interaction-based approach

S Maniu, T Abdessalem, B Cautis – Proceedings of the 20th international …, 2011 – dl.acm.org
… Our preliminary study provides valuable insight into principles underlying a signed network
of Wikipedia contributors that is cap- tured by social interaction …

Volunteers in Wikipedia: Why the community matters

H Baytiyeh, J Pfaffman – Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2010 – JSTOR
… enable worldwide communication that supports social interaction, cooperation, and collaboration
for learning and knowledge building (Friedman, 2005). In Wikipedia, members are free …

[PDF] Why do people write for Wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open–content publishing

A Forte, A Bruckman – Proc. of GROUP, 2005 – jellis.org
… motivations that participants bring to a social interaction, an incentive … and power) are subtly
determined through interaction and discourse … In Wikipedia, the power of participants is not …

Save Cite Cited by 220 Related articles All 6 versions

Expert participation on Wikipedia: barriers and opportunities

D Taraborelli, D Mietchen, P Alevizou, A Gill – 2011 – oro.open.ac.uk
… and cultural nature, from the lack of incentives from the perspective of a professional career, to
the poor recognition of one’s expertise within Wikipedia to issues of social interaction …

Why Every Business Leader Should Make An Empathy Plan For 2022


Defined by Merriam-Webster as “something that causes strong feelings of worry or anxiety,” stress has been rising in Americans for years. But now it seems to have become the prevailing emotion of the 2020s.

In a survey earlier this year by the American Psychological Association, 84 percent of adults reported feeling at least one emotion associated with prolonged stress in the preceding two weeks. The most significant sources of anxiety were the future of the nation, the coronavirus pandemic, and political unrest.

For businesses, this environment has accelerated a dramatic change: Market winners and losers are being decided based on empathy—companies’ ability to put themselves in customers’ shoes and show, in every interaction, deep and genuine concern for their wants, needs, and priorities.


To be sure, customer experience (CX)—how a company engages with customers at every stage of the buying journey—already had become an essential business priority in a digital age that has given consumers unprecedented choices and power. But making customers feel trust and delight on an emotional level has gone from being an aspiration to an expectation in the last year and a half.

A recent report by contact center technology provider Talkdesk shows that most consumers have higher expectations of companies they do business with today than before the pandemic.

In the retail sector specifically, according to the study, 58 percent of retail customers said their expectations of their preferred brands have increased in the last year. “Ease, speed and ability to transition across channels of choice during interactions rate among their top priorities,” the report said.

According to a McKinsey report in August, e-commerce sales continue to experience huge growth, with online penetration remaining approximately 35 percent above pre-pandemic levels and e-commerce logging more than 40 percent growth over the past 12 months.

This means that retailers truly can no longer ignore that the line between digital and in-store experiences for consumers has rapidly disappeared and consumers no longer differentiate where and when they had an experience with a business, just how it felt.

Even the most eternal optimist would have a hard time believing the stressed-out climate will subside anytime soon, so businesses need to be planning for 2022 and beyond with one thing in mind: How can we forge a memorably positive emotional connection with customers and consistently deliver a consistently delightful, empathy-driven experience? Here are three ways to get there.


1. Make customer empathy the company’s central cultural value.

Many businesses still operate in silos, but, as described above, customers no longer do. Thus, companies need to shed old ways of how the business has been structured and organized and adopt new ones based solely on how customers see and work with them. Everyone on every team in every department must have a clear understanding of their role in providing a holistic, empathy-driven experience and how each channel and touchpoint integrates to make that happen.

As part of the effort to cultivate human experience as a core value, every individual in the company should be able to see, hear, and feel the customers’ experience—not just a select few whose “job” it is.

Finally, companies must ask themselves if they have the right leaders for this time. Does the CEO grasp where to prioritize investments to drive the experiences customers are demanding? Do executives across the C-suite have the right levels of empathy, authenticity, and emotional intelligence? In today’s world, leaders must make decisions with their hearts as much as their heads. “Soft skills” are the new hard skills.

2. Focus on human experience as much as data.

Understanding customers on a deeper level—who they are, what their lives are like, and what their motivations are for using a product or service—has become harder as customer experiences have become less human and more digital. Companies are trying to build deep connections with perhaps millions of people they may never actually see.

As a result, most businesses have turned to collecting and analyzing data—clicks, sales conversion statistics, email response rates, survey responses, etc.—to try to glean customer insights.

But while quantitative methods can help uncover trends and patterns, (for example, that 65 percent of web page visitors are leaving without going beyond the home page) they tell only half the story: Data can provide the “what” behind customer behavior but not the “why.” It is devoid of color and context—the many nuances around customer experience that can come only from observing and interacting with customers first-hand.

Interaction with real customers must be combined with companies’ data-centric processes to inform every aspect of product design, creation, and support.

3. Take advantage of technology.

Technology exists—video, live interviews, and other research studies—to continually see and hear what customers are thinking. Companies should leverage this technology to build a feedback loop that drives the brand forward from the customer’s viewpoint—a virtuous circle in which one desirable outcome from human insights leads to another and drives continuous improvement.

In a product or app launch, for example, this can include live customer interviews before design starts, quick validation of prototypes and sketches, continuous verification during development to validate decisions and reveal problem areas, and post-launch gathering of insights to reveal any issues that weren’t found earlier.

By following these three steps, businesses can make customer empathy part of their brand’s lifeblood. In these times, there may be no greater differentiator.

By : usertesting

Source: Why every business leader should make an empathy plan for 2022


Related Links:

Roebuck, Chris (2011-12-22). “Critical need for Entrepreneurial Leaders during turbulent times“Entrepreneurial Leadership – A Primer

Compare: Roebuck, Chris (2011-12-22). “Critical need for Entrepreneurial Leaders during turbulent times“ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP. Leading Innovation, Leading Change, Pursuing Opportunities – a New Managerial Task in the New Economy

“Traits of Successful Entrepreneurs”

“Archived copy”. Archived from the originalLeitch, Claire M.; Harrison, Richard T. (2018-01-26).

“The evolving field of entrepreneurial leadership: an overview“Definition of ‘Autocratic Leadership

Guo, Xuezhi (2019). “Traditional Political Thought and Imperial Legacy”. The Politics of the Core Leader in China: Culture, Institution, Legitimacy, and PowerMarstiller, James K.; Joerding Fickeler, Jennifer (2005).

The Power to Innovate: Rewiring the Minds of Individuals and OrganizationsCano, PE, Librado F. (2010).

Transformation Of An Individual Family Community Nation And The WorldSaxena Dr., P.K. (2009).

Principles of Management, A Modern ApproachEvans, Jules (2012-05-04).

“What can business leaders learn from ancient philosophersSy, T.; Cote, S.; Saavedra, R. (2005).

“The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes”Compare: Vasconcelos e Sá, Jorge (2012).

There is no leadership: only effective management: Lessons from Lee’s Perfest Battle, Xenophon’s Cyrus the Great and the practice of the best managers in the worldIlies, Remus; Morgeson, Frederick P.; Nahrgang, Jennifer D. (2005-06-01).

“Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes”Hoyt, C. L.; Blascovich, J. (2016-07-26).

“Leadership Efficacy and Women Leaders’ Responses to Stereotype ActivationSergent, Kayla (2020).

“Women’s Leadership Is Associated With Fewer Deaths During the COVID-19 Crisis: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of United States GovernorsVinkenberg; Engen; Eagly; Johannesen-Schmidt (2011).

“An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to womens promotion?

How To Retrain Your Frazzled Brain and Find Your Focus Again

Are you finding it harder than ever to concentrate? Don’t panic: these simple exercises will help you get your attention .

Picture your day before you started to read this article. What did you do? In every single moment – getting out of bed, turning on a tap, flicking the kettle switch – your brain was blasted with information. Each second, the eyes will give the brain the equivalent of 10m bits (binary digits) of data. The ears will take in an orchestra of sound waves. Then there’s our thoughts: the average person, researchers estimate, will have more than 6,000 a day. To get anything done, we have to filter out most of this data. We have to focus.

Focusing has felt particularly tough during the pandemic. Books are left half-read; eyes wander away from Zoom calls; conversations stall. My inability to concentrate on anything – work, reading, cleaning, cooking – without being distracted over the past 18 months has felt, at times, farcical.

The good news? We can learn to focus better, but we need to think about attention differently. It is not something we can just choose to do. We have to train the brain like a muscle. Specifically, with short bursts of daily exercises.

Dr Amishi Jha is a professor of cognitive and behavioural neuroscience at the University of Miami and an expert in the science of attention. She has written a book called Peak Mind: Find Your Focus, Own Your Attention, Invest 12 Minutes a Day, a four-week training programme based on her research showing how simple mindfulness exercises carried out by people with high-demand jobs, such as soldiers, elite athletes and emergency medics, improve many aspects of cognitive and emotional health, including strengthening our attention.

‘Working memory is like a mental whiteboard with disappearing ink,’ says Dr Amishi Jha. Illustration: Nathalie Lees/The Guardian

When I first opened Peak Mind, I set a timer to see how long it would take me to feel the pull of social media. Three minutes in, I check Twitter. I tell Jha this and she erupts with laughter. “Oh, that’s fantastic,” she says.

I tell her this distractibility has made me anxious. She nods patiently. “There is nothing wrong with your attention, even if you feel more distracted right now. That is a healthy response to your current situation. To think otherwise is just false,” she says. “We’re in a crisis because our attention works so well. It’s doing exactly what it was designed to do: respond powerfully to certain stimuli.”

Stress is one of the biggest obstacles to focusing, says Jha. In a high-alert state, we often start ruminating and catastrophising. We get stuck in “loops of doom” or imagined scenarios. This mode impacts our “working memory”: the amount of information that can be held in our minds and used for a task. For example, choosing the words to put together in an email, or reading a page in a book.

“Working memory is like a mental whiteboard with disappearing ink,” says Jha. When that whiteboard is full of thoughts, feelings and images relating to what’s making us stressed, there is no room for new information. We might start blanking, zoning out or snapping at our partners, then feel guilty, which makes focusing even harder.

The first step to better focus is accepting a key truth: you cannot just decide to have unfettered attention

Jha began thinking differently about mindfulness when she experienced her own “crisis of attention” (“a blaring, unrelenting onslaught of mental chatter,” she writes) that reduced her ability to feel present with her small children.

So she came up with some simple practices “that exercise the brain in ways that it is prone to being weakened”. These short bursts of mindfulness training each day can help us notice the traffic of our thoughts and urges, and develop what Jha calls the “mental muscle” to observe, rather than act.

I admit that I am sceptical. Even as a trainee psychotherapist (with a vested interest in learning to be present) I find it hard to believe that something so stark, that we can do by ourselves, can help focus a mind that feels scrambled by multiple lockdowns, political divisiveness or economic uncertainty.

I start by setting a timer for three minutes each day, instead of the recommended 12 – a smaller “dose”, encouraged by Jha, to get used to it. The first exercise involves sitting upright, closing your eyes and focusing on where your breathing feels most prominent, usually in the chest or diaphragm. Direct your focus here like a beam and notice when thoughts or sensations pull it away: a memory bubbling up; a reminder that you need to reply to a text; an itch. The point is noticing when the “flashlight” moves, then moving it back. That’s it.

From the beginning, this flashlight image is one of the most useful mindfulness tools I’ve used. After three days, I start to notice when I am being pulled away from trying to focus on something (reading is trickiest for me). I am noticing when my focus is ruptured, which feels new.

The first step to better focus is accepting a key truth, says Jha: you cannot just decide to have unfettered attention. You have to practise. “The notion of an unwavering mind is a fantasy,” she says. The problem is that we now have far more sources of distraction. We are not just recipients of content, but willing participants. Despite how often we are encouraged to “unplug” from our devices, we cannot outwit the algorithms designed by armies of software engineers, statisticians and psychologists.

More unsettling is how we need our phones to rescue us from our phones. The global mindfulness meditation apps market size is expected to reach over $4.2bn by 2027. But in stepping back and learning why our attention can feel so slippery – rather than reaching for another attention-sucking app – perhaps we can assuage some of the difficult emotions associated with being distracted.

In week two, Jha introduces the “body scan”. Using the flashlight to move through the body, from toes to scalp, you are encouraged to notice what physical sensations are there. Whenever the mind wanders, return it to the area of the body where the attention was before the wandering.

Even in three-minute bursts, my mind fizzes with words, people, places and feelings. I tell Jha that I have to move my flashlight back so many times, I wonder if it will ever feel easier. “You’re doing great!” she says. “You have introduced something new and it can take time to get used to it. But know that it will get better.”

After a fortnight of doing the exercises, I notice that being able to carve a little sliver of space between myself and the contents of my mind means I am able to divert my attention back to what I need to do more easily. The body scan exercise has given me a new awareness of how distracted I am by physical sensations (a cramp; a gurgle; an itch). It is hard to explain how significant this layer of awareness is unless you’ve tried it.

I am going to carry on with the exercises, with a view to building up to the 12-minute daily dose, because something is shifting in my relationship with my thoughts. I begin another book after I finish Jha’s and reset my timer. It takes me 23 minutes to open Twitter. That’s progress.

Attention, please: five ways to focus better

1 Pay attention to your breath, and where on your body you feel it most: direct your focus like a beam of light. Do this for three minutes a day, for a week.

2 Integrate this technique into everyday life – for example, brushing your teeth. If you’re thinking about your to-do list as you’re scrubbing, bring the light back. Focus on the sensations.

3 A lot of people report that their mind is “too busy.” Your job is not to stop it – your job is to exist with it, and to place your attention back where you want it.

4 Ignore “mindfulness myths”: you are not “clearing your mind.” This is an active mental workout.

5 There is no “blissed-out” state you are aiming to experience; in fact, the whole point is to be more present to the moment.

By: Eleanor Morgan

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/

Related Contents:

Ayd, Frank J., Jr. (2000). Lexicon of Psychiatry, Neurology and the Neurosciences. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. p. 688. ISBN978-0781724685. Shulman, Robert G. (2013). “Neuroscience: A Multidisciplinary, Multilevel Field”. Brain Imaging: What it Can (and Cannot) Tell Us About Consciousness. Oxford University Press. p. 59. ISBN9780199838721. Ogawa, Hiroto; Oka, Kotaro (2013). Methods in Neuroethological Research. Springer. p. v. ISBN9784431543305. Tanner, Kimberly D. (2006-01-01). “Issues in Neuroscience Education: Making Connections”. CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5 (2): 85. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-04-0156. ISSN1931-7913. PMC1618510. Kandel, Eric R. (2012). Principles of Neural Science, Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill Education. p. 5. ISBN978-0071390118. The last frontier of the biological sciences – their ultimate challenge – is to understand the biological basis of consciousness and the mental processes by which we perceive, act, learn, and remember. Mohamed W (2008). “The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus: Neuroscience in Ancient Egypt”. IBRO History of Neuroscience. Archived from the original on 2014-07-06. Retrieved 2014-07-06. Herodotus (2009) [440 BCE]. The Histories: Book II (Euterpe). Translated by George Rawlinson. Breitenfeld, T.; Jurasic, M. J.; Breitenfeld, D. (September 2014). “Hippocrates: the forefather of neurology”. Neurological Sciences. 35 (9): 1349–1352. doi:10.1007/s10072-014-1869-3. ISSN1590-3478. PMID25027011. S2CID2002986. Plato (2009) [360 BCE]. Timaeus. Translated by George Rawlinson. Finger, Stanley (2001). Origins of Neuroscience: A History of Explorations into Brain Function (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 3–17. ISBN978-0-19-514694-3. Freemon, F. R. (23 Sep 2009). “Galen’s ideas on neurological function”. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences. 3 (4): 263–271. doi:10.1080/09647049409525619. ISSN0964-704X. PMID11618827. Finkelstein, Gabriel (2013). Emil du Bois-Reymond: Neuroscience, Self, and Society in Nineteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge; London: The MIT Press. pp. 72–74, 89–95. ISBN9780262019507. Harrison, David W. (2015). Brain Asymmetry and Neural Systems Foundations in Clinical Neuroscience and Neuropsychology. Springer International Publishing. pp. 15–16. ISBN978-3-319-13068-2. “Caton, Richard – The electric currents of the brain”. echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de. Retrieved 2018-12-21. Coenen, Anton; Edward Fine; Oksana Zayachkivska (2014). “Adolf Beck: A Forgotten Pioneer In Electroencephalography”. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences. 23 (3): 276–286. doi:10.1080/0964704x.2013.867600. PMID24735457. S2CID205664545. Guillery, R (Jun 2005). “Observations of synaptic structures: origins of the neuron doctrine and its current status”. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360 (1458): 1281–307. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1459. PMC1569502. PMID16147523. Greenblatt SH (1995). “Phrenology in the science and culture of the 19th century”. Neurosurgery. 37 (4): 790–805. doi:10.1227/00006123-199510000-00025. PMID8559310. Bear MF; Connors BW; Paradiso MA (2001). Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN978-0-7817-3944-3. Kandel ER; Schwartz JH; Jessel TM (2000). Principles of Neural Science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN978-0-8385-7701-1. Cowan, W.M.; Harter, D.H.; Kandel, E.R. (2000). “The emergence of modern neuroscience: Some implications for neurology and psychiatry”. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 23: 345–346. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.343. PMID10845068. “James McGaugh”. The history of neuroscience in autobiography. Volume. 4. Squire, Larry R., Society for Neuroscience. Washington DC: Society for Neuroscience. 1996. p. 410. ISBN0916110516. OCLC36433905. “History – Department of Neurobiology”. Archived from the original on 2019-09-27. Retrieved 2017-10-17. “History of IBRO”. International Brain Research Organization. 2010. The BeginningArchived April 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, International Society for Neurochemistry “About EBBS”. European Brain and Behaviour Society. 2009. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. “About SfN”. Society for Neuroscience. “How can neuroscience inform economics?” (PDF). Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. Zull, J. (2002). The art of changing the brain: Enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC “What is Neuroethics?”. http://www.neuroethicssociety.org. Retrieved 2019-02-22. Petoft, Arian (2015-01-05). “Neurolaw: A brief introduction”. Iranian Journal of Neurology. 14 (1): 53–58. ISSN2008-384X. PMC4395810. PMID25874060. Fan, Xue; Markram, Henry (2019-05-07). “A Brief History of Simulation Neuroscience”. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 13: 32. doi:10.3389/fninf.2019.00032. ISSN1662-5196. PMC6513977. PMID31133838. U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Brain basics: genes at work in the brain. Date last modified: 2018-12-27. [1] Retrieved Feb. 4, 2019. The United States Department of Health and Human Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. “Chapter 2: The Fundamentals of Mental Health and Mental Illness” pp 38 [2] Retrieved May 21, 2012 Aragona M, Kotzalidis GD, Puzella A. (2013) The many faces of empathy, between phenomenology and neuroscience. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 4:5-12 http://www.archivespp.pl/uploads/images/2013_15_4/5Aragona_APP_4_2013.pdf Ofengenden, Tzofit (2014). “Memory formation and belief” (PDF). Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences. 7 (2): 34–44. Gordon, Ross; Ciorciari, Joseph; Van Laer, Tom (2018). “Using EEG to examine the role of attention, working memory, emotion, and imagination in narrative transportation”. European Journal of Marketing. 52: 92–117. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0881. SSRN2892967. Haeusler, S.; Maass, W. (2017). “Application of modelling and nanotechnology-based approaches: The emergence of breakthroughs in theranostics of central nervous system disorders”. Life Sciences. 182: 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2017.06.001. PMID28583367. S2CID7598262. Maojo, V.; Chiesa, S.; Martin-Sanchez, F.; Kern, J.; Potamias, G.; Crespo, J.; Iglesia, D. D. L. (2011). “International Efforts in Nanoinformatics Research Applied to Nanomedicine”. Methods of Information in Medicine. 50 (1): 84–95. doi:10.3414/me10-02-0012. PMID21085742. Poater, A.; Saliner, A. G.; Carbó-Dorca, R.; Poater, J.; Solà, M.; Cavallo, L.; Worth, A. P. (2009). “Modeling the structure-property of nanoneedles: A journey toward nanomedicine”. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 30 (2): 275–284. doi:10.1002/jcc.21041. PMID18615420. S2CID2304139. Haeusler, S.; Maass, W. (2006). “A Statistical Analysis of Information-Processing Properties of Lamina-Specific Cortical Microcircuit Models”. Cerebral Cortex. 17 (1): 149–162. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj132. PMID16481565. Cancès, Eric; Defranceschi, Mireille; Kutzelnigg, Werner; Le Bris, Claude; Maday, Yvon (2003-01-01). “Computational quantum chemistry: A primer”. Special Volume, Computational Chemistry. Handbook of Numerical Analysis. Special Volume, Computational Chemistry. 10. Elsevier. pp. 3–270. doi:10.1016/s1570-8659(03)10003-8. ISBN9780444512482. Retrieved 2020-04-30. Ghosh, S.; Matsuoka, Y.; Asai, Y.; Hsin, K.-Y.; Kitano, H. (2011). “Software for systems biology: from tools to integrated platforms”. Nature Reviews Genetics. 12 (12): 821–832. doi:10.1038/nrg3096. PMID22048662. S2CID21037536. Shah, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, W.; Gao, J. (2011). “Modeling Particle Shape-Dependent Dynamics in Nanomedicine”. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 11 (2): 919–928. doi:10.1166/jnn.2011.3536. PMC3050532. PMID21399713. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/dec/03/bionic-neurons-could-enable-implants-to-restore-failing-brain-circuitshttps://interestingengineering.com/artificial-neuron-retains-electronic-memories Lepage M (2010). “Research at the Brain Imaging Centre”. Douglas Mental Health University Institute. Archived from the original on March 5, 2012. Gordon E (2003). “Integrative neuroscience”. Neuropsychopharmacology. 28 Suppl 1: S2-8. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300136. PMID12827137. Panksepp J (1990). “A role for “affective neuroscience” in understanding stress: the case of separation distress circuitry”. In Puglisi-Allegra S; Oliverio A (eds.). Psychobiology of Stress. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. pp. 41–58. ISBN978-0-7923-0682-5. Chiao, J.Y. & Ambady, N. (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In Kitayama, S. and Cohen, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Cultural Psychology, Guilford Press, New York, pp. 237-254. Shepherd, Gordon M. 1933- (2013-07-16). Neurogastronomy : how the brain creates flavor and why it matters. ISBN9780231159111. OCLC882238865. “Financial and organizational highlights” (PDF). Society for Neuroscience. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 15, 2012. Société des Neurosciences“About Us”. Simply Neuroscience. Retrieved 2021-07-14. “About Us, Project Encephalon”. Project Encephalon. Retrieved 24 October 2020. International Brain Initiative“International Brain Initiative | The Kavli Foundation”. http://www.kavlifoundation.org. Retrieved 2019-05-29. AustraliaCanadaKoreaIsrael Rommelfanger, Karen S.; Jeong, Sung-Jin; Ema, Arisa; Fukushi, Tamami; Kasai, Kiyoto; Ramos, Khara M.; Salles, Arleen; Singh, Ilina; Amadio, Jordan (2018). “Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives”. Neuron. 100 (1): 19–36. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021. PMID30308169. “About the International Brain Bee”. The International Brain Bee. “Brain Facts: A Primer on the Brain and Nervous System”. Society for Neuroscience. “Neuroscience Core Concepts: The Essential Principles of Neuroscience”. Society for Neuroscience. Archived from the original on April 15, 2012. “Brain Awareness Week Campaign”. The Dana Foundation. “Official CIHR Canadian National Brain Bee Website”. Archived from the original on May 30, 2014. Retrieved 24 September 2014. “Archived copy”. Archived from the original on 2018-08-26. Retrieved 2018-08-26. Goswami U (2004). “Neuroscience, education and special education”. Br J Spec Educ. 31 (4): 175–183. doi:10.1111/j.0952-3383.2004.00352.x. “The SEPA Program”. NIH. Archived from the original on September 20, 2011. Retrieved September 23, 2011. “About Education and Human Resources”. NSF. Retrieved September 23, 2011. https://rebootingcomputing.ieee.org/images/files/pdf/4-rcs2-hylton_-_intro_to_neuromorphic_computing.pdf“Beyond von Neumann, Neuromorphic Computing Steadily Advances”. HPCwire. 2016-03-21. Retrieved 2021-10-08. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1904”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1906”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1914”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1932”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1936”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1938”. Nobel Foundation. Archived from the original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1944”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1949”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1957”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1961”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1970”. Nobel Foundation. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1981”. Nobel Foundation. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1986”. Nobel Foundation. Archived from the original on 3 February 2014. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1997”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 1 July 2019. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2000”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 28 July 2007. “The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2003”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 4 April 2019. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2004”. Nobel Foundation. Archived from the original on 19 August 2007. Retrieved 28 January 2020. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2014”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 7 October 2013. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2017”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 2 October 2017.

  1. “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2021”. Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 4 October 2021.

Further reading

%d bloggers like this: